H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 0-1
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2008 Stockholm third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2008* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-3 6-4 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |