H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs María-Teresa Torró-Flor H2H: 1-1
Marina Erakovic and María-Teresa Torró-Flor are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on clay, while María-Teresa Torró-Flor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro third round 7-6(8) 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2016 | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marina Erakovic | 7-6(8) 6-7(5) 6-2 | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | 6-0 6-4 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| María-Teresa Torró-Flor | #700 | #47 | 1,155 | 1,688 | 30 | 50 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |