H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marina Erakovic vs Shahar Peer H2H: 0-1

Shahar Peer holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shahar Peer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2013 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-3 6-4.

New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shahar Peer #128 6-3 6-4 Marina Erakovic #63 Match data Mar 8, 2013* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marina Erakovic #827 #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,969 269 206 56.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marina Erakovic Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,510 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,635 0 0
19 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,828 0 3
20 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,833 0 3
21 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0 2008 25–21 54.3% #38 1,710 0 3
22 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,788 0 5
23 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,888 0 5
24 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,708 0 5
25 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,669 0 1 2012 15–23 39.5% #74 1,585 0 5
26 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,559 0 5
27 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,527 0 5
29 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marina Erakovic Shahar Peer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 3 3 6 50.0%
18 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 2006 22 14 36 61.1% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2007 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 2008 20 15 35 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 28 14 42 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 32 14 46 69.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2011 20 14 34 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 6 9 15 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 191 136 327 58.4% 62 48 110 56.4% 13 18 31 41.9% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 370/469 of Shahar Peer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marina Erakovic Shahar Peer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 —/— 2005 5/42 1.4 4.4 55.4% 58.1% 41.3% 58.7% 48.3% 50.7% 44.8%
19 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8% 2006 30/58 1.1 3.6 64.3% 60.8% 44.2% 51.0% 52.2% 54.9% 47.0%
20 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8% 2007 58/60 1.3 2.8 66.3% 63.0% 48.5% 53.0% 52.1% 58.4% 47.4%
21 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2% 2008 37/46 1.1 2.6 68.0% 61.7% 44.5% 47.6% 45.8% 56.2% 46.1%
22 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6% 2009 48/57 1.5 2.1 65.2% 61.3% 47.9% 52.4% 48.8% 56.5% 47.1%
23 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5% 2010 63/68 1.5 3.1 64.4% 64.7% 46.9% 55.5% 49.4% 58.4% 45.9%
24 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6% 2011 41/44 1.2 3.0 63.5% 60.5% 43.0% 50.2% 46.0% 54.1% 42.9%
25 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4% 2012 35/38 1.2 3.5 63.2% 59.5% 42.5% 41.1% 48.8% 53.4% 44.7%
26 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9% 2013 23/24 0.6 3.2 64.9% 57.9% 42.9% 54.5% 48.3% 52.4% 45.5%
27 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0% 2014 26/28 0.8 4.7 62.5% 59.2% 39.5% 44.3% 48.8% 51.9% 45.1%
28 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0% 2015 4/4 0.8 3.3 63.6% 52.0% 42.6% 26.5% 60.4% 48.4% 37.1%
29 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1% —/—
Career 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4% 370/475 1.2 3.1 64.7% 61.4% 45.1% 50.5% 49.2% 55.7% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marina Erakovic Shahar Peer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1498 95.1 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.29 2004 1510 102.5 +18 53.8% -0.08 0–1 +0.42
18 2005 1636 124.9 -1.60 +0.29 0.910 48.0% -10 -58 -78 51.0% -0.03 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 102.4 -0.40
19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +5 21.4% -1.36 1–1 +0.10 2006 1829 146.6 -0.62 +1.81 1.042 50.8% -41 -7 -266 61.9% +1.04 11–7 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.4 +0.31
20 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -43 +12 +208 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05 2007 1833 153.0 +2.29 +3.68 1.138 52.8% +7 +25 -154 63.6% +0.84 6–8 (43%) 9–4 (69%) 101.8 +0.52
21 2009 1514 108.9 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -38 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 -0.07 2008 1710 132.5 +0.71 +1.58 1.054 51.1% +42 +32 0 52.0% +0.17 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 0.00
22 2010 1480 102.7 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -44 +254 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) -0.06 2009 1789 138.4 +1.20 +2.73 1.084 52.0% +30 -85 60.5% +0.76 9–4 (69%) 8–2 (80%) 108.3 -0.03
23 2011 1627 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -74 +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 +0.24 2010 1888 152.7 +2.81 +2.91 1.104 52.2% -10 -19 -200 62.7% +0.97 14–4 (78%) 5–6 (45%) 106.9 -0.29
24 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -33 +124 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89 2011 1708 130.0 -0.93 -0.58 0.936 48.7% +54 +67 49.5% -0.07 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 101.2 +1.40
25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -29 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26 2012 1586 125.7 -1.37 +0.83 0.959 49.0% +71 +119 +14 41.3% -0.51 1–9 (10%) 2–5 (29%) 86.0 -0.53
26 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +39 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) -0.33 2013 1559 108.2 -2.36 -0.25 0.955 49.0% +34 +89 41.8% -0.56 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) +1.54
27 2015 1542 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +77 -39 +69 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36 2014 1539 108.9 -3.44 +0.83 0.938 48.5% +5 +83 +40 40.3% -0.91 4–7 (36%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.24
28 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55 2015 1527 104.5 -1.91 -2.82 0.718 42.6% 22.2% -2.22 1–0 0–2 -0.28
29 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) -0.44 2016 1478 88.7
Career 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.32 1969 140.8 +0.35 +1.76 1.032 50.7% +14 +16 -88 54.5% +0.32 76–60 (56%) 51–41 (55%) 103.9 +0.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.