H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-1
Marketa Vondrousova and Julia Goerges are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marketa Vondrousova leads 1–0 on clay, while Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2018 Wuhan second round 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2018* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2018* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-2 6-2 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marketa Vondrousova | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |