H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 1-1
Marketa Vondrousova and Laura Siegemund are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2020 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2020* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marketa Vondrousova | 6-4 7-6(6) | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |