H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-1
Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 1–0 lead over Marta Marrero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2002 Scottsdale third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-2 6-1 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |