H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Elena Vesnina H2H: 0-1
Elena Vesnina holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Vesnina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elena Vesnina | 7-5 6-1 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Elena Vesnina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |