H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-1
Martina Trevisan and Kiki Bertens are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Martina Trevisan won the 2020 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Martina Trevisan | 6-4 6-4 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-2 6-1 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |