H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Martina Trevisan vs Kristyna Pliskova H2H: 0-1
Kristyna Pliskova holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Trevisan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristyna Pliskova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristyna Pliskova won the 2021 Cluj-Napoca 1 third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2021* | Cluj-Napoca 1 | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-4 6-4 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Trevisan | Kristyna Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |