H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Melinda Czink vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 0-2

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 2–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Amélie Mauresmo won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-1 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amélie Mauresmo #17 6-1 4-6 6-2 Melinda Czink #54 Match data Jun 24, 2009* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Amélie Mauresmo #3 6-3 6-2 Melinda Czink #133 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Melinda Czink Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Melinda Czink Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — — — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 143/226 of Melinda Czink's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Melinda Czink Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Melinda Czink Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.