H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Melinda Czink vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2004 Palermo third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2004* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Melinda Czink | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |