H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 0-1

Maria Kirilenko holds a 1–0 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Kirilenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Kirilenko won the 2010 Bank of the West Classic first round 6-1 6-4.

CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Kirilenko #27 6-1 6-4 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #150 Match data Jul 29, 2010* R32 Bank of the West Classic Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni — #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Maria Kirilenko — #10 3,471 1,919 287 231 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1
19 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1
20 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2 2007 29–27 51.8% #25 1,740 0 2
21 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5
22 — — — — — — — 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,721 0 5
23 — — — — — — — 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,830 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6
28 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Maria Kirilenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
18 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — 204 152 356 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mirjana Lucic-Baroni Maria Kirilenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52
16 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +121 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.60 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35
17 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.61 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -42 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38
18 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06
19 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13
20 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 2007 1740 141.5 +3.14 +1.28 1.100 52.1% +5 -193 -198 54.3% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 -1.01
21 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09 2008 1725 136.9 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +94 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.03
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1721 129.6 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -219 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.09
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1830 151.9 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -270 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1849 143.8 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% -1 -89 -261 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59
25 2007 1538 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.12 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +19 -110 -41 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1792 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +15 +5 -69 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73
27 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +13 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37
28 2010 1555 111.8 — — — — -71 — +159 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1552 110.2 — — — — -83 +118 +143 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +123 +177 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -114 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1625 128.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -45 +80 -9 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +8 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 132.7 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.08 — 1919 145.4 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.