H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 1-2
Andrea Petkovic holds a 2–1 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 2–0 on clay, while Misaki Doi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2022 Hamburg fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-3 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2022 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-4 6-2 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2015* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Misaki Doi | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 6-3 6-3 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |