H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-3
Madison Brengle holds a 3–1 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2019 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 6-4 6-0 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2017* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Misaki Doi | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Madison Brengle | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 6-1 7-5 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2015* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 6-0 6-3 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Madison Brengle | #210 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,740 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Misaki Doi | Madison Brengle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |