Mona Barthel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiki Bertens | 6 | 3 | 9 | May 25, 2018 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 4 | 4 | 8 | May 1, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Timea Babos | 3 | 2 | 5 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Mona Barthel vs Jing-Jing Lu H2H: 1-0
Mona Barthel holds a 1–0 lead over Jing-Jing Lu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2017 Guangzhou Open first round 6-0 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | 6-0 4-6 6-3 | Jing-Jing Lu | Match data | Sep 20, 2017* | R32 | Guangzhou Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mona Barthel | #205 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,840 | 151 | 182 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,549 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mona Barthel | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,713 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,602 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,457 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,556 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mona Barthel | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 96 | 104 | 200 | 48.0% | 38 | 51 | 89 | 42.7% | 10 | 25 | 35 | 28.6% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | Career | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 309/334 of Mona Barthel's and 17/17 of Jing-Jing Lu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Mona Barthel | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2010 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 64.3% | 66.7% | 52.0% | 60.0% | 0.0% | 61.4% | 31.3% | 2008 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 54.8% | 68.8% | 49.9% | 83.3% | 70.0% | 60.1% | 36.8% |
| 2011 | 11/11 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 61.8% | 63.6% | 38.0% | 50.5% | 45.8% | 53.6% | 43.1% | 2009 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 58.9% | 57.0% | 35.7% | 33.3% | 39.7% | 48.3% | 43.8% |
| 2012 | 50/53 | 4.2 | 5.7 | 53.8% | 70.4% | 46.7% | 53.9% | 50.1% | 59.2% | 46.4% | 2010 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 49.3% | 52.5% | 38.6% | 43.8% | 25.0% | 46.2% | 33.5% |
| 2013 | 46/46 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 61.5% | 66.4% | 45.6% | 56.9% | 46.0% | 58.5% | 43.7% | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 59.2% | 44.1% | 30.6% | 43.3% | 10.0% | 36.9% | 37.7% |
| 2014 | 43/46 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 64.9% | 45.0% | 55.3% | 46.4% | 57.1% | 43.0% | 2016 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 52.9% | 54.5% | 44.9% | 56.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 49.4% |
| 2015 | 35/50 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 59.3% | 64.0% | 49.5% | 47.1% | 42.6% | 58.1% | 41.4% | 2017 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 54.9% | 59.2% | 39.2% | 47.6% | 36.1% | 50.3% | 42.1% |
| 2016 | 18/20 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 55.2% | 66.7% | 43.9% | 50.0% | 46.3% | 56.8% | 39.4% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 53.7% | 43.5% | 46.0% | 64.3% | 50.3% | 40.5% |
| 2017 | 34/35 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 61.2% | 65.8% | 43.6% | 53.5% | 46.5% | 56.9% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 34/34 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 57.7% | 66.0% | 43.3% | 56.9% | 45.8% | 56.3% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 19/19 | 4.1 | 6.3 | 57.6% | 67.5% | 41.5% | 48.3% | 42.4% | 56.3% | 38.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 14/15 | 5.4 | 6.3 | 53.6% | 68.6% | 42.3% | 49.5% | 37.8% | 56.5% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 10.0 | 51.7% | 54.0% | 44.0% | 14.3% | 32.5% | 49.3% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 59.7% | 62.5% | 38.1% | 53.3% | 30.6% | 52.6% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 309/334 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 58.5% | 66.4% | 44.9% | 52.9% | 45.4% | 57.4% | 42.2% | Career | 17/17 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 56.9% | 56.3% | 40.1% | 49.4% | 41.5% | 49.1% | 40.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mona Barthel | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2010 | 1493 | 100.8 | +1.29 | +0.85 | 0.810 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2008 | 1504 | 102.9 | +1.75 | -1.27 | 0.922 | 48.8% | — | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 2011 | 1552 | 119.1 | -0.55 | -0.55 | 0.929 | 48.7% | +28 | -19 | — | 45.8% | -0.46 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.58 | 2009 | 1482 | 101.3 | -1.06 | -0.30 | 0.847 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 2012 | 1682 | 144.4 | +3.00 | +2.35 | 1.139 | 52.8% | +34 | -50 | -166 | 57.8% | +0.69 | 3–11 (21%) | 10–12 (45%) | 92.9 | -2.53 | 2010 | 1461 | 97.9 | -2.41 | -2.92 | 0.622 | 39.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 2013 | 1646 | 138.9 | +2.09 | +0.25 | 1.053 | 51.1% | +80 | -90 | -184 | 53.4% | +0.41 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–7 (46%) | 97.5 | -0.66 | 2011 | 1442 | 94.0 | -1.58 | -0.65 | 0.597 | 38.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 2014 | 1713 | 124.3 | +1.01 | -0.81 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -62 | -24 | -158 | 50.5% | -0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.5 | -0.80 | 2016 | 1474 | 103.1 | -3.35 | +1.52 | 0.988 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 2015 | 1671 | 128.2 | -0.49 | -0.40 | 0.986 | 49.6% | +10 | -45 | — | 51.7% | +0.24 | 10–14 (42%) | 10–10 (50%) | 96.5 | +2.15 | 2017 | 1535 | 104.6 | -3.20 | -1.74 | 0.847 | 46.2% | +19 | — | — | 38.5% | -1.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.26 |
| 2016 | 1561 | 109.3 | +0.53 | -2.53 | 0.913 | 48.2% | +29 | +35 | -55 | 37.8% | -0.73 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | 96.5 | -0.82 | 2018 | 1514 | 101.1 | -2.41 | -1.84 | 0.814 | 45.4% | +16 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 |
| 2017 | 1602 | 121.9 | +0.49 | -0.40 | 0.977 | 49.6% | -11 | +63 | -97 | 48.8% | -0.34 | 6–8 (43%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.9 | -0.52 | 2023 | 1502 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1625 | 120.7 | -0.13 | -2.87 | 0.910 | 48.2% | +7 | -36 | -60 | 42.2% | -0.52 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.3 | -0.60 | 2024 | 1485 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1550 | 122.1 | -0.64 | -2.56 | 0.876 | 47.5% | +130 | -29 | — | 32.6% | -1.02 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–3 (40%) | 103.3 | -0.70 | 2025 | 1479 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1535 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1457 | 106.9 | -0.29 | -3.24 | 0.854 | 46.7% | +105 | — | — | 26.5% | -1.44 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.4 | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1420 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1525 | 110.3 | -2.16 | -0.17 | 0.843 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1576 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1556 | 106.9 | +0.24 | -2.27 | 0.918 | 47.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1841 | 131.0 | +0.87 | -0.58 | 0.990 | 49.8% | +28 | -20 | -126 | 47.5% | -0.11 | 46–65 (41%) | 47–51 (48%) | 95.2 | -1.43 | Career | 1550 | 101.6 | -1.95 | -1.35 | 0.792 | 44.9% | +18 | — | — | 29.3% | -1.71 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–0 | — | +6.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jing-Jing Lu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
| Alisa Kleybanova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Fang Ying Xun | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Kurumi Nara | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 1, 2018 | H2H |