H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mona Barthel vs Rebecca Peterson H2H: 1-1

Mona Barthel and Rebecca Peterson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay, while Rebecca Peterson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2015 Bastad quarterfinal 6-1 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mona Barthel
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Rebecca Peterson
Sweden Age 31 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mona Barthel #52 6-1 7-6(3) Rebecca Peterson #164 Match data Jul 18, 2015* QF Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Rebecca Peterson #250 6-4 4-2 (ret.) Mona Barthel #84 Match data Mar 18, 2014* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Rebecca Peterson #573 #43 1,332 1,861 80 95 45.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mona Barthel Rebecca Peterson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #263 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2014 1–2 33.3% #230 1,489 0 0
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0 2015 3–4 42.9% #131 1,505 0 0
20 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0 2016 3–6 33.3% #146 1,505 0 0
21 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1 2017 2–3 40.0% #174 1,550 0 0
22 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #63 1,693 0 0
23 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3 2019 25–18 58.1% #44 1,861 0 2
24 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3 2020 3–10 23.1% #55 1,697 0 2
25 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3 2021 18–18 50.0% #88 1,699 0 2
26 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4 2022 7–14 33.3% #119 1,659 0 2
27 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4 2023 8–7 53.3% #127 1,647 0 2
28 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mona Barthel Rebecca Peterson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 2018 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 17 9 26 65.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2021 15 13 28 53.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2022 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2023 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% — 58 51 109 53.2% 18 34 52 34.6% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 309/334 of Mona Barthel's and 168/174 of Rebecca Peterson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mona Barthel Rebecca Peterson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 1.0 3.0 64.3% 41.7% 40.0% 45.5% 66.7% 41.1% 42.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 0.7 4.0 64.5% 51.3% 36.8% 49.5% 42.5% 46.3% 44.1%
19 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3% 2015 5/7 0.8 4.8 70.0% 57.3% 48.6% 36.8% 50.3% 55.0% 41.0%
20 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1% 2016 9/9 1.6 3.6 68.4% 61.4% 41.7% 48.7% 51.7% 55.4% 40.7%
21 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4% 2017 5/5 2.2 3.2 64.2% 63.6% 48.6% 73.1% 59.8% 58.0% 42.1%
22 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7% 2018 21/21 3.6 3.7 63.7% 62.9% 41.3% 57.6% 50.4% 55.0% 43.1%
23 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0% 2019 42/43 2.2 2.8 67.1% 61.9% 50.4% 57.2% 44.5% 58.0% 43.3%
24 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4% 2020 13/13 1.5 2.8 66.5% 55.9% 44.5% 36.8% 30.4% 51.8% 39.5%
25 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4% 2021 34/36 2.3 3.4 65.5% 62.2% 47.7% 52.4% 47.4% 57.1% 41.3%
26 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2% 2022 20/21 1.9 3.7 63.7% 61.1% 42.5% 45.1% 45.0% 54.0% 39.8%
27 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8% 2023 15/15 2.1 4.1 65.3% 64.3% 40.5% 53.5% 51.5% 55.9% 45.3%
28 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2% — 168/175 2.2 3.4 65.7% 61.3% 45.5% 52.1% 46.5% 55.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mona Barthel Rebecca Peterson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1488 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1485 102.5 +3.18 +1.91 0.716 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.28
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1490 101.8 -1.67 +0.24 0.821 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
19 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.14 2015 1505 104.6 -0.71 -1.19 0.911 47.7% — -1 — 37.5% -1.06 2–0 1–1 — -0.09
20 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 — 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.58 2016 1506 107.2 -0.91 -1.94 0.911 48.2% +59 -42 — 42.1% -0.37 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
21 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53 2017 1550 106.4 +0.60 -1.14 1.003 50.3% +49 — — 45.5% -0.36 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
22 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66 2018 1693 125.9 -0.84 -0.13 0.960 49.2% +26 -250 -63 46.7% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.7 +0.29
23 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80 2019 1862 140.3 +1.54 +0.91 1.032 50.8% -2 -323 -222 53.6% +0.22 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 106.5 -2.59
24 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 — 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15 2020 1698 103.7 -2.62 -2.51 0.819 45.3% +41 -190 — 20.8% -2.08 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.28
25 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82 2021 1700 129.0 +0.81 -0.92 0.963 49.2% +11 -79 — 49.4% -0.04 6–7 (46%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -0.71
26 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52 2022 1659 117.2 -1.27 -2.53 0.866 47.2% +49 -54 — 33.3% -0.89 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
27 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60 2023 1647 126.0 -0.31 +1.31 1.028 50.7% +73 -62 — 48.5% +0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 97.8 -0.35
28 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 — 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70 2024 1645 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2020 1535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 — — 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1420 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1576 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1556 106.9 +0.24 -2.27 0.918 47.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43 — 1862 129.7 0.00 -0.51 0.952 49.0% +25 -149 -151 44.3% -0.36 28–25 (53%) 18–28 (39%) 101.5 -2.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.