H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Monica Niculescu vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 3-3

Monica Niculescu and Timea Bacsinszky are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Timea Bacsinszky leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Bacsinszky won the 2017 Indian Wells second round 7-5 6-2.

ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
SUI Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Timea Bacsinszky #16 7-5 6-2 Monica Niculescu #45 Match data
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Timea Bacsinszky #11 4-6 6-2 6-1 Monica Niculescu #47 Match data
Jul 7, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Timea Bacsinszky #15 1-6 7-5 6-2 Monica Niculescu #48 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Monica Niculescu #85 6-0 6-3 Timea Bacsinszky #50 Match data
Jul 15, 2010* Prague WTA 250 R32 Clay Monica Niculescu #114 6-3 7-5 Timea Bacsinszky #41 Match data
Feb 12, 2009* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Monica Niculescu #47 6-4 6-3 Timea Bacsinszky #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,933 161 137 54.0% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Niculescu Timea Bacsinszky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0
17 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0
18 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0 2008 13–15 46.4% #54 1,592 0 0
20 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1
21 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,693 0 1
22 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,662 0 1
23 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,602 0 1
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,596 0 1
25 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1
26 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,842 0 3
27 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2 2016 32–17 65.3% #15 1,777 0 4
28 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,816 0 4
29 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,725 0 4
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3 2019 4–9 30.8% #139 1,630 0 4
31 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3