H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Monica Niculescu vs Tsvetana Pironkova H2H: 2-2

Monica Niculescu and Tsvetana Pironkova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Niculescu leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tsvetana Pironkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tsvetana Pironkova won the 2017 Eastbourne third round 6-0 6-4.

ROU Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
BUL Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2017* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Tsvetana Pironkova #149 6-0 6-4 Monica Niculescu #51 Match data
Aug 25, 2011* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Monica Niculescu #70 6-3 6-2 Tsvetana Pironkova #51 Match data
Jan 21, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Monica Niculescu #85 6-4 6-1 Tsvetana Pironkova #36 Match data
Jan 8, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Tsvetana Pironkova #44 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Monica Niculescu #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Monica Niculescu #958 #28 1,960 1,807 176 213 45.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tsvetana Pironkova #1,170 #31 1,805 1,770 169 222 43.2% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Niculescu Tsvetana Pironkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 6–3 66.7% #86 1,599 0 0
18 2006 15–16 48.4% #64 1,662 0 0
19 2007 0–1 0.0% #152 1,490 0 0 2007 7–15 31.8% #95 1,596 0 0
20 2008 8–15 34.8% #48 1,542 0 0 2008 15–17 46.9% #44 1,631 0 0
21 2009 10–22 31.2% #103 1,522 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #97 1,546 0 0
22 2010 6–9 40.0% #82 1,573 0 0 2010 16–15 51.6% #35 1,623 0 0
23 2011 21–15 58.3% #30 1,755 0 0 2011 13–22 37.1% #46 1,644 0 0
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #58 1,639 0 0 2012 19–23 45.2% #42 1,658 0 0
25 2013 22–21 51.2% #59 1,637 0 1 2013 9–21 30.0% #108 1,561 0 0
26 2014 22–19 53.7% #46 1,687 0 2 2014 17–19 47.2% #38 1,619 0 1
27 2015 20–21 48.8% #39 1,677 0 2 2015 18–21 46.2% #59 1,633 0 1
28 2016 25–17 59.5% #38 1,782 0 3 2016 10–12 45.5% #64 1,671 0 1
29 2017 10–19 34.5% #77 1,618 0 3 2017 6–10 37.5% #165 1,639 0 1
30 2018 9–15 37.5% #99 1,588 0 3
31 2019 8–11 42.1% #118 1,627 0 3
32 2020 0–2 0.0% #144 1,579 0 3 2020 6–2 75.0% #136 1,739 0 1
33 2021 0–3 0.0% #274 1,514 0 3 2021 3–6 33.3% #252 1,706 0 1