H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Monica Puig vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-1

Monica Puig and Timea Bacsinszky are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Timea Bacsinszky leads 1–0 on grass, while Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2018 New Haven first round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Monica Puig
PUR Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Timea Bacsinszky
Switzerland Age 37 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Puig #72 7-5 6-1 Timea Bacsinszky #751 Match data Aug 22, 2018* R32 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Timea Bacsinszky #20 6-1 3-6 6-0 Monica Puig #69 Match data Jul 5, 2017* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Monica Puig #1,073 #27 1,570 1,843 139 140 49.8% 0 1 0 0 0 1 2
Timea Bacsinszky #941 #9 3,157 1,935 163 141 53.6% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Monica Puig Timea Bacsinszky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #252 1,484 0 0
17 2011 0–1 0.0% #211 1,492 0 0 2006 3–3 50.0% #124 1,541 0 0
18 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 2007 2–6 25.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 2013 13–15 46.4% #56 1,570 0 0 2008 13–16 44.8% #54 1,589 0 0
20 2014 16–18 47.1% #59 1,614 0 1 2009 17–10 63.0% #53 1,739 0 1
21 2015 15–23 39.5% #92 1,578 0 1 2010 19–21 47.5% #50 1,694 0 1
22 2016 41–24 63.1% #32 1,770 0 2 2011 3–6 33.3% #247 1,663 0 1
23 2017 20–21 48.8% #58 1,724 0 2 2012 2–6 25.0% #179 1,604 0 1
24 2018 18–14 56.2% #53 1,780 0 2 2013 0–1 0.0% #237 1,597 0 1
25 2019 16–19 45.7% #79 1,686 0 2 2014 11–10 52.4% #48 1,678 0 1
26 2020 0–2 0.0% #105 1,623 0 2 2015 37–14 72.5% #12 1,845 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2016 32–19 62.7% #15 1,758 0 4
28 2022 0–1 0.0% #1073 1,619 0 2 2017 15–9 62.5% #39 1,809 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2018 3–8 27.3% #191 1,721 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #139 1,641 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Monica Puig Timea Bacsinszky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2013 5 11 16 31.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2014 9 12 21 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2016 25 14 39 64.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2011 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 17 15 32 53.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2018 17 12 29 58.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 7 13 20 35.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 24 9 33 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 91 94 185 49.2% 34 30 64 53.1% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — — 86 83 169 50.9% 66 44 110 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/279 of Monica Puig's and 266/303 of Timea Bacsinszky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Monica Puig Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 1/1 2.0 7.0 59.8% 64.5% 41.2% 53.8% 50.0% 55.1% 45.8% 2006 3/6 3.7 3.3 51.7% 77.8% 56.8% 87.9% 61.7% 67.9% 44.9%
18 2012 1/2 4.0 3.0 50.0% 62.5% 53.1% 75.0% 0.0% 57.8% 30.0% 2007 5/8 2.0 2.2 57.5% 63.2% 43.5% 44.1% 47.8% 54.5% 41.3%
19 2013 27/28 2.7 2.7 62.4% 62.4% 51.4% 41.8% 51.2% 58.1% 43.0% 2008 25/29 2.6 3.0 55.2% 62.1% 45.0% 45.3% 40.7% 54.5% 44.2%
20 2014 33/34 3.1 4.4 59.8% 66.4% 46.7% 51.1% 46.9% 58.4% 42.7% 2009 23/27 3.2 2.4 59.3% 64.1% 45.7% 57.5% 50.2% 56.6% 45.3%
21 2015 32/38 4.4 4.0 60.7% 65.2% 51.0% 50.2% 49.1% 59.4% 38.4% 2010 38/40 2.3 3.7 58.8% 61.1% 45.5% 58.0% 53.3% 54.4% 44.8%
22 2016 52/65 3.1 3.6 62.0% 64.8% 49.8% 58.7% 46.5% 59.0% 44.7% 2011 4/9 3.5 5.8 55.6% 62.9% 38.2% 59.9% 44.2% 51.9% 42.0%
23 2017 39/41 3.3 3.4 60.1% 65.6% 47.8% 54.0% 45.1% 58.7% 42.8% 2012 8/8 0.5 2.6 66.8% 50.8% 35.6% 37.0% 43.7% 45.9% 41.9%
24 2018 31/32 3.0 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 45.7% 52.7% 48.6% 58.6% 42.1% 2013 1/1 0.0 4.0 66.1% 51.2% 42.9% 44.4% 66.7% 48.4% 41.9%
25 2019 33/35 3.3 3.6 62.5% 66.1% 48.0% 60.1% 51.9% 59.1% 44.1% 2014 20/21 1.5 2.5 67.0% 62.6% 44.5% 56.6% 47.4% 56.7% 46.1%
26 2020 2/2 1.5 6.0 64.6% 55.7% 28.2% 29.8% 28.6% 46.0% 34.8% 2015 44/51 1.9 3.0 67.9% 63.4% 52.1% 51.8% 51.3% 59.8% 44.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 47/52 1.1 2.0 68.4% 62.2% 48.3% 52.0% 47.0% 57.6% 46.8%
28 2022 1/1 0.0 5.0 60.3% 51.2% 33.3% 53.8% 33.3% 44.1% 32.7% 2017 24/24 1.8 2.0 65.9% 62.6% 52.8% 52.0% 48.6% 59.5% 47.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 11/11 1.7 3.5 63.4% 61.9% 41.4% 50.7% 50.5% 54.6% 40.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 13/16 1.7 1.7 63.4% 59.2% 45.7% 48.6% 52.5% 54.3% 44.2%
Career — 252/279 3.2 3.6 61.2% 65.2% 48.4% 53.3% 47.8% 58.6% 42.6% — 266/305 1.9 2.7 63.5% 62.1% 47.2% 52.7% 49.0% 56.5% 45.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Monica Puig Timea Bacsinszky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1485 103.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — -0.11
17 2011 1492 103.5 -1.04 -2.47 1.020 50.6% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.15 2006 1542 116.2 +3.56 +1.88 1.400 57.0% +31 -31 — 36.4% -0.64 1–0 — — -0.37
18 2012 1464 94.8 -3.46 -3.96 0.711 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 2007 1522 115.5 -0.18 -0.57 0.907 47.9% — -4 — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.40
19 2013 1571 123.3 +1.46 -0.93 1.027 50.5% -93 +68 +69 50.0% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 +0.09 2008 1589 126.2 -0.62 +0.29 0.970 49.3% +20 -40 — 44.6% -0.45 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 -0.23
20 2014 1615 129.5 +1.33 -0.33 1.027 50.6% -75 +119 0 48.7% +0.15 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 102.0 -0.29 2009 1740 124.9 +0.62 +0.51 1.044 51.0% -48 -88 — 56.7% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.7 +0.19
21 2015 1579 121.9 +0.62 -2.26 0.948 49.1% +9 +55 -13 42.4% -0.19 3–8 (27%) 5–11 (31%) 91.9 -0.38 2010 1694 127.2 -1.10 +1.16 0.983 49.6% -12 -15 — 46.6% -0.19 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 +1.27
22 2016 1771 137.9 +2.19 +1.46 1.092 52.0% -9 -57 -89 58.9% +0.70 12–5 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 108.8 -0.14 2011 1664 120.0 +0.92 +0.57 0.873 47.3% -9 — — 36.4% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.28
23 2017 1724 133.3 +2.17 -0.36 1.036 50.7% +15 -63 — 47.4% -0.04 8–9 (47%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 -0.88 2012 1604 100.6 -3.34 -1.85 0.775 43.6% +16 +53 — 25.0% -1.58 1–1 0–1 — -0.15
24 2018 1780 137.8 +0.96 +0.23 1.017 50.5% +6 — — 56.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 -0.76 2013 1597 104.4 -0.12 +0.61 0.812 45.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.32
25 2019 1686 127.3 +1.69 +0.90 1.076 51.5% -34 +39 -64 50.0% +0.35 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 92.6 -0.89 2014 1679 141.7 +1.87 +2.26 1.066 51.2% -13 +1 — 53.3% +0.42 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.84
26 2020 1624 94.4 -0.47 -3.91 0.644 40.5% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 2015 1845 146.1 +1.78 +3.78 1.118 52.2% -20 -75 -157 64.4% +0.91 16–4 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 109.4 -1.30
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1759 141.7 +1.97 +2.62 1.105 52.1% -20 +159 -87 60.0% +0.77 10–5 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.1 +1.27
28 2022 1619 101.3 +0.44 +1.01 0.584 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14 2017 1809 137.6 +2.69 +3.09 1.176 53.2% -61 +141 -121 66.0% +1.45 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 -0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1722 119.2 -1.27 -1.05 0.891 47.5% -27 — — 34.6% -1.58 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1642 126.3 -1.44 +0.08 0.966 49.1% +23 +199 — 42.1% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 94.1 -0.93
Career — 1843 134.9 +1.52 -0.09 1.029 50.7% -18 +21 -39 50.3% +0.16 40–50 (44%) 29–34 (46%) 100.5 -1.10 — 1936 141.2 +0.69 +1.70 1.038 50.7% -15 +35 -124 52.4% +0.21 53–45 (54%) 19–33 (37%) 96.0 -0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.