H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Na Li vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-3

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–2 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.

CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Na Li #6 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #68 Match data
Jan 22, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Na Li #6 3-0 (ret.) Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 Match data
Oct 16, 2008* Zurich WTA 500 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 6-2 6-4 Na Li #28 Match data
May 26, 2007* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 2-6 6-3 7-5 Na Li #18 Match data
Apr 13, 2007* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 6-4 7-5 Na Li #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9