H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 2-3

Anna Chakvetadze holds a 3–2 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Chakvetadze won the 2010 Moscow round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Anna Chakvetadze
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna Chakvetadze #68 6-4 6-2 Na Li #11 Match data Oct 21, 2010* R32 Moscow Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Na Li #29 7-6(7) 6-4 Anna Chakvetadze #6 Match data Feb 21, 2008* R32 Qatar Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anna Chakvetadze #11 4-6 7-5 6-2 Na Li #17 Match data Mar 24, 2007* QF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #38 7-5 6-3 Anna Chakvetadze #30 Match data May 31, 2006* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Anna Chakvetadze #31 7-5 6-4 Na Li #43 Match data Aug 10, 2005* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Anna Chakvetadze #577 #5 2,940 2,066 183 135 57.5% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Anna Chakvetadze
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #83 1,527 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2005 24–21 53.3% #32 1,715 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2006 37–20 64.9% #13 1,914 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 2007 56–19 74.7% #6 1,988 0 6
21 — — — — — — — 2008 26–23 53.1% #18 1,723 0 7
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2009 14–18 43.8% #67 1,714 0 7
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2010 18–15 54.5% #56 1,714 0 8
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2011 3–8 27.3% #234 1,640 0 8
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2012 3–8 27.3% #224 1,555 0 8
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Anna Chakvetadze
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 23 11 34 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 39 13 52 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 121 86 207 58.5% 29 30 59 49.2% 22 15 37 59.5% 11 4 15 73.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 250/318 of Anna Chakvetadze's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/5 3.3 5.3 61.2% 60.8% 43.7% 34.3% 55.6% 54.0% 45.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 13/45 1.8 4.8 58.2% 62.8% 38.8% 47.2% 39.5% 53.3% 43.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 39/57 2.9 3.7 59.4% 64.2% 46.6% 54.3% 46.9% 57.0% 44.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 67/75 3.0 3.7 60.3% 66.4% 49.0% 57.7% 51.2% 59.4% 47.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 44/49 3.6 6.5 55.3% 64.7% 41.6% 55.3% 53.0% 54.3% 47.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 31/32 1.8 5.7 63.5% 60.6% 41.0% 48.9% 53.9% 53.4% 44.7%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2010 33/33 1.7 5.0 61.2% 60.5% 45.7% 53.6% 50.7% 55.1% 45.8%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2011 9/11 2.1 3.8 58.9% 60.7% 41.5% 50.7% 47.5% 53.1% 46.0%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2012 11/11 2.5 3.4 60.5% 62.6% 40.0% 44.4% 57.5% 53.5% 41.2%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 250/318 2.7 4.7 59.7% 63.6% 44.6% 53.4% 50.7% 55.9% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Anna Chakvetadze
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1528 120.5 +0.93 +0.41 0.997 50.0% +25 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2005 1716 140.9 -0.63 +0.16 0.934 48.6% -37 -113 -71 51.9% +0.09 10–6 (63%) 0–7 (0%) 103.3 -1.79
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2006 1915 148.0 +1.63 +1.41 1.040 50.8% -5 -246 -221 63.0% +0.79 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 107.1 -2.00
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1988 159.4 +3.68 +3.72 1.156 53.1% +9 -222 -132 69.6% +1.32 15–4 (79%) 11–10 (52%) 107.4 -0.45
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1724 136.7 -0.16 +2.53 1.031 50.8% +43 -1 +130 53.3% +0.29 12–14 (46%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 +2.95
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2009 1714 134.0 -0.92 +1.31 0.958 49.2% +9 +9 +92 45.7% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 -0.09
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2010 1714 128.7 -0.49 +1.32 1.020 50.4% +15 -55 +111 56.8% +0.36 6–6 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.41
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2011 1641 112.2 +0.12 +1.73 0.980 49.6% +60 — — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — -0.46
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2012 1556 102.0 -1.55 -1.87 0.886 47.7% +83 +20 — 36.4% -0.91 0–2 0–1 — +0.48
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 2067 147.7 +0.95 +1.99 1.038 50.8% +11 -114 -36 56.9% +0.44 62–48 (56%) 29–38 (43%) 99.6 -0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.