H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Na Li vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-1
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 1–0 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-1 7-5 | Na Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,117 | 338 | 159 | 68.0% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,384 | 720 | 271 | 72.7% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,066 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,080 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,167 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 63–16 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,283 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,167 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,111 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,025 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 2008 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,034 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,923 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,862 | 1 | 5 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,796 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #7 | 1,999 | 1 | 6 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,067 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,028 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |