H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Na Li vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-1
Na Li holds a 2–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2007 Dubai third round 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2007* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | Na Li | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Na Li | 6-0 1-6 6-4 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2006* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Na Li | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Eleni Daniilidou | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |