H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 2-1

Na Li holds a 2–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2007 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eleni Daniilidou #42 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 Na Li #16 Match data Feb 22, 2007* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Na Li #22 6-0 1-6 6-4 Eleni Daniilidou #64 Match data Aug 31, 2006* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #32 7-6(7) 6-3 Eleni Daniilidou #70 Match data Jun 15, 2006* R32 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 187 206 47.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #314 1,490 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,499 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2004 23–20 53.5% #34 1,716 0 3
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,648 0 3
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,722 0 4
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2008 8–9 47.1% #144 1,667 0 5
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,646 0 5
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,640 0 5
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,553 0 5
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,479 0 5
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,427 0 5
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,409 0 5
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Eleni Daniilidou
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 14 11 25 56.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 17 13 30 56.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 21 12 33 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2006 20 15 35 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 19 18 37 51.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2011 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 7 13 20 35.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 124 127 251 49.4% 26 46 72 36.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 168/325 of Eleni Daniilidou's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/56 1.3 5.2 66.6% 63.7% 40.6% 60.1% 43.4% 55.8% 44.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 8/43 1.8 5.9 69.5% 64.1% 42.1% 62.4% 44.6% 57.6% 47.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/34 1.3 5.6 65.2% 58.9% 42.6% 44.5% 44.1% 52.2% 43.3%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2006 19/51 0.8 5.1 69.1% 60.0% 46.4% 42.5% 48.0% 56.0% 46.7%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2007 51/56 0.7 5.7 69.8% 59.2% 38.2% 50.7% 51.7% 52.8% 44.3%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2008 14/17 1.2 4.9 64.4% 57.6% 32.9% 33.2% 66.8% 48.9% 42.0%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 61.6% 49.1% 48.5% 27.3% 66.7% 48.8% 46.8%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2010 5/5 1.6 5.6 63.1% 59.9% 46.5% 49.4% 39.8% 54.8% 42.1%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% 2011 16/18 0.8 5.9 64.1% 59.1% 41.2% 46.5% 45.1% 52.4% 44.0%
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% 2012 26/29 1.5 5.7 64.5% 58.1% 41.4% 45.5% 40.1% 52.2% 39.0%
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% 2013 11/13 1.6 8.9 65.2% 59.8% 31.4% 48.6% 32.2% 49.8% 39.0%
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% 2014 2/2 0.0 6.5 71.6% 53.6% 16.9% 27.3% 41.7% 43.1% 38.2%
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 168/393 1.1 5.8 67.0% 59.3% 39.6% 47.1% 47.4% 52.7% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Eleni Daniilidou
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1491 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.02
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2001 1500 107.9 — — — — +36 -22 +106 40.0% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.52
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2002 1778 141.4 — — — — -106 -221 +113 58.6% +0.69 9–11 (45%) 5–6 (45%) 100.1 -1.37
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1706 136.7 +0.41 +0.45 1.001 50.0% +5 -93 +150 56.7% +0.20 7–8 (47%) 10–2 (83%) 102.0 +1.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1717 141.0 +1.29 +1.68 1.128 52.6% +42 -116 — 55.9% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 101.4 +1.59
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2005 1648 126.9 -1.18 +0.37 0.906 47.8% +10 -104 +191 44.2% -0.49 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 -2.10
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2006 1723 136.1 +0.35 +1.65 1.061 51.1% +25 -187 +90 54.0% +0.18 8–9 (47%) 3–4 (43%) 97.2 -2.71
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2007 1720 130.6 -2.20 +0.32 0.938 48.6% +11 -224 +88 47.2% -0.16 13–10 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 104.4 +0.19
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2008 1668 121.0 -3.18 -0.53 0.821 46.1% -1 — — 46.7% -0.50 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.67
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2009 1647 100.7 +1.13 +0.09 0.915 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.05
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2010 1641 109.4 -1.18 -1.96 0.933 48.3% +16 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–0 — -0.22
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2011 1554 103.4 -2.59 +0.59 0.925 48.1% +34 -96 — 38.1% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.9 +0.84
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2012 1479 112.0 -2.35 -3.57 0.817 45.6% +54 -42 +181 33.3% -1.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.19
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 2013 1428 100.8 -3.67 -2.11 0.776 44.5% +39 — — 28.1% -1.81 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.45
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 2014 1409 94.6 -1.70 -2.31 0.671 40.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1878 134.3 -1.78 -0.36 0.913 48.0% +9 -146 +126 48.9% -0.13 64–65 (50%) 44–34 (56%) 102.2 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.