H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-0

Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2005 Morocco Open round of 16 6-0 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #35 6-0 3-6 6-2 Jelena Dokic #443 Match data May 6, 2005* R16 Morocco Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 — — — — — — — 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Jelena Dokic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Jelena Dokic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4%
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0%
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Jelena Dokic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.