H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Na Li vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 1-0
Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2005 Rabat fourth round 6-0 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2005* | Rabat | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Na Li | 6-0 3-6 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |