H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 2-0

Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2007 Miami Open round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #17 6-0 6-1 Katarina Srebotnik #23 Match data Mar 22, 2007* R32 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #21 7-5 6-1 Katarina Srebotnik #23 Match data Jan 13, 2007* QF Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,851 225 206 52.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2000 8–19 29.6% #120 1,449 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,494 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,724 0 2
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2004 14–19 42.4% #87 1,604 0 2
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,753 0 4
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,834 0 4
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,743 0 4
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,622 0 4
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Katarina Srebotnik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 5 6 16.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 19 15 34 55.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 17 14 31 54.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 24 16 40 60.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 124 114 238 52.1% 82 63 145 56.6% 12 18 30 40.0% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 180/318 of Katarina Srebotnik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Katarina Srebotnik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/49 1.8 2.8 61.3% 64.2% 49.5% 61.9% 41.5% 58.3% 43.3%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2004 6/33 1.8 3.7 60.5% 56.9% 38.9% 36.1% 56.4% 50.5% 46.9%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2005 6/45 1.3 1.3 63.8% 61.5% 44.7% 52.3% 49.0% 55.8% 42.7%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2006 40/54 2.6 1.9 65.7% 67.5% 47.7% 56.2% 51.5% 60.8% 45.8%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2007 47/51 2.7 2.6 67.2% 65.3% 45.8% 54.6% 48.1% 58.9% 45.5%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2008 57/66 3.6 2.8 61.1% 69.0% 50.3% 53.3% 48.9% 61.8% 45.4%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% 2009 7/7 1.1 4.9 61.4% 58.3% 39.0% 43.0% 48.9% 50.9% 42.2%
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% 2010 12/13 2.3 4.5 63.1% 62.2% 43.3% 51.9% 36.2% 55.5% 38.2%
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 180/431 2.8 2.7 64.0% 66.0% 47.0% 53.4% 48.4% 59.3% 44.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Katarina Srebotnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 1999 1520 114.5 — — — — -39 +131 — 48.9% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — +1.91
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2000 1450 112.4 — — — — +44 +97 — 34.4% -0.79 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.6 +0.46
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 114.5 — — — — -1 +52 — 41.5% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.12
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1724 137.6 — — — — -64 -4 -229 55.9% +0.46 9–5 (64%) 2–6 (25%) 103.9 -0.69
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2003 1682 127.1 +1.15 +0.28 1.039 50.6% -14 +27 -125 47.2% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 100.2 +0.07
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2004 1604 113.1 -1.79 +0.77 0.946 48.8% -16 +108 -137 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 +0.35
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2005 1754 134.9 +0.20 -0.62 0.965 49.0% -3 -80 -248 58.5% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 103.2 +0.75
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2006 1787 145.5 +3.94 +1.32 1.169 53.1% +10 -81 -227 56.3% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) 96.4 +0.95
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2007 1757 138.6 +2.28 +1.88 1.106 52.0% +11 -27 -168 54.1% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.0 +0.63
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2008 1834 150.3 +5.53 +1.46 1.188 53.5% -27 +6 -230 61.6% +1.10 10–13 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.8 -1.10
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2009 1744 104.1 -2.58 -0.87 0.860 46.8% -28 — — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.19
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2010 1623 113.9 -1.08 -2.93 0.858 46.9% +1 +158 — 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.28
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1852 138.0 +3.03 +1.03 1.101 51.9% -9 +24 -194 51.5% +0.22 63–72 (47%) 32–53 (38%) 91.4 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.