H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Na Li vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-2
Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Bali semifinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2005* | Bali | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-2 6-2 | Na Li | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lindsay Davenport | 6-4 6-4 | Na Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Lindsay Davenport | #35 | #1 | 6,100 | 2,353 | 704 | 190 | 78.7% | 3 | 13 | 1 | 25 | 12 | 54 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Lindsay Davenport | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #348 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #20 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,022 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,013 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,161 | 0 | 12 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 68–14 | 82.9% | #1 | 2,283 | 1 | 18 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #2 | 2,297 | 2 | 25 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 56–13 | 81.2% | #2 | 2,228 | 3 | 29 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 3 | 36 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #12 | 2,153 | 3 | 36 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 48–15 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,076 | 3 | 37 |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 64–10 | 86.5% | #1 | 2,203 | 3 | 44 |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | 2005 | 58–11 | 84.1% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 50 |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 | 2006 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #25 | 2,122 | 3 | 50 |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 | 2007 | 13–1 | 92.9% | #72 | 2,147 | 3 | 52 |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 | 2008 | 23–6 | 79.3% | #35 | 2,063 | 3 | 54 |