H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Maria Kirilenko H2H: 4-1

Na Li holds a 4–1 lead over Maria Kirilenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2011 New Haven round of 16 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Maria Kirilenko
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #7 6-4 7-6(4) Maria Kirilenko #26 Match data Aug 26, 2011* R16 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Na Li #19 6-4 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #59 Match data Sep 6, 2009* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #18 6-1 3-6 6-1 Maria Kirilenko #38 Match data May 9, 2007* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #25 6-1 6-2 Maria Kirilenko #21 Match data Aug 24, 2006* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Maria Kirilenko #82 6-4 6-3 Na Li #57 Match data Feb 12, 2005* QF Hyderabad Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Maria Kirilenko #947 #10 3,471 1,918 286 230 55.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Maria Kirilenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2002 0–3 0.0% #373 1,479 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2003 5–5 50.0% #124 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 8–9 47.1% #107 1,575 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2005 29–21 58.0% #25 1,740 0 1
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2006 23–25 47.9% #30 1,657 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2007 28–26 51.9% #25 1,739 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2008 34–22 60.7% #29 1,724 0 5
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2009 21–24 46.7% #62 1,720 0 5
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2010 37–23 61.7% #20 1,829 0 5
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2011 29–23 55.8% #28 1,848 0 5
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 2012 33–22 60.0% #14 1,797 0 5
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2013 34–18 65.4% #19 1,791 0 6
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2014 5–9 35.7% #187 1,715 0 6
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Maria Kirilenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 23 12 35 65.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 17 17 34 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 17 41 58.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 17 36 52.8% 15 3 18 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 15 27 44.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 27 16 43 62.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 22 13 35 62.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 24 13 37 64.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 203 151 354 57.3% 56 46 102 54.9% 23 28 51 45.1% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 385/513 of Maria Kirilenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Maria Kirilenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/10 0.7 4.7 67.0% 62.0% 54.6% 48.5% 58.2% 59.5% 41.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/17 1.7 6.7 58.3% 62.1% 49.2% 53.1% 46.4% 56.7% 42.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/50 1.6 2.7 59.7% 57.9% 43.6% 52.4% 52.3% 52.4% 35.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 34/48 2.3 4.6 60.9% 63.7% 45.3% 51.9% 41.2% 56.5% 44.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 47/54 2.5 3.5 65.8% 64.6% 48.1% 52.4% 46.7% 58.8% 45.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/56 1.8 3.0 67.5% 61.8% 47.0% 51.0% 49.8% 57.0% 46.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 42/45 1.8 3.2 63.3% 61.6% 45.0% 49.9% 46.5% 55.6% 43.5%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2010 56/60 1.6 2.7 65.1% 64.4% 48.9% 51.5% 46.6% 59.0% 46.4%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2011 47/52 1.7 3.0 69.1% 62.7% 49.8% 48.9% 51.8% 58.6% 47.3%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2012 41/55 2.6 3.2 65.0% 65.3% 44.9% 52.7% 49.7% 58.2% 44.6%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2013 46/52 3.3 3.7 59.5% 64.8% 49.8% 56.9% 44.3% 58.9% 43.5%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2014 12/14 2.2 3.6 64.6% 59.2% 36.4% 48.8% 39.3% 50.9% 41.6%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 385/516 2.2 3.4 64.5% 63.3% 47.2% 51.8% 47.2% 57.6% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Maria Kirilenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.3 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.52
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1522 108.4 +0.26 -0.99 1.013 51.2% +31 — — 43.5% -0.70 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 +0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1576 122.0 -0.20 -0.34 0.970 49.9% +27 — -41 50.0% -0.11 1–3 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.38
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2005 1741 139.7 -0.75 -3.22 0.755 44.4% +24 -184 -189 57.5% +0.42 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.8 -0.06
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2006 1657 138.5 +0.48 +1.03 1.025 50.5% +25 -46 — 49.0% -0.22 3–9 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.8 +0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1740 140.8 +3.14 +1.31 1.100 52.1% +5 -194 -199 54.4% +0.57 7–12 (37%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.64
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1725 136.8 +1.27 +1.62 1.084 51.7% -38 +93 — 57.4% +0.66 14–12 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 99.4 +2.04
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2009 1720 129.5 +0.33 -0.34 0.978 49.6% -26 +33 -218 45.8% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 102.2 -1.07
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2010 1830 151.8 +3.21 +2.46 1.133 52.6% -13 -36 -271 60.2% +0.86 11–8 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 103.5 +1.69
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2011 1848 143.7 +2.41 +3.15 1.143 52.8% 0 -89 -260 56.6% +0.67 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 +0.59
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 2012 1798 144.6 +2.23 +1.06 1.066 51.4% +18 -110 -42 60.0% +0.85 8–9 (47%) 10–5 (67%) 99.8 -0.37
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2013 1791 145.9 +2.97 +0.16 1.057 51.1% +16 +6 -68 63.0% +1.01 10–2 (83%) 7–3 (70%) 108.1 +0.73
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2014 1715 111.8 -3.39 -0.94 0.847 46.1% +74 +12 -13 36.7% -1.07 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 -0.37
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1919 145.3 +1.84 +1.16 1.058 51.2% +5 -27 -136 55.0% +0.44 80–75 (52%) 50–45 (53%) 101.9 +0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.