H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Marta Domachowska H2H: 2-1

Na Li holds a 2–1 lead over Marta Domachowska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Marta Domachowska
POL Age 40 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #25 6-4 6-2 Marta Domachowska #92 Match data May 26, 2009* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Marta Domachowska #146 2-6 6-2 6-4 Na Li #30 Match data Jan 20, 2008* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #76 6-3 3-6 6-1 Marta Domachowska #72 Match data Jan 15, 2005* QF Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Marta Domachowska #943 #37 1,002 1,675 67 99 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Marta Domachowska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #350 1,485 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–3 0.0% #252 1,439 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 2004 12–7 63.2% #73 1,611 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2005 19–23 45.2% #59 1,550 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 12–23 34.3% #91 1,521 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 4–5 44.4% #143 1,550 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 2008 14–17 45.2% #65 1,572 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 2009 5–12 29.4% #137 1,525 0 0
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2010 0–4 0.0% #296 1,468 0 0
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 2012 1–2 33.3% #228 1,463 0 0
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2013 0–2 0.0% #437 1,433 0 0
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Marta Domachowska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 9 14 23 39.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 14 24 41.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 11 20 45.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 40 57 97 41.2% 24 34 58 41.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 86/143 of Marta Domachowska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Marta Domachowska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/42 4.2 8.5 53.5% 70.9% 38.4% 39.1% 60.5% 55.6% 47.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/35 3.4 4.2 59.2% 64.2% 41.5% 47.8% 41.0% 54.7% 41.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 7/9 3.6 3.0 57.3% 62.9% 43.5% 56.7% 31.8% 55.0% 42.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 29/31 2.9 7.0 56.2% 64.6% 38.9% 55.1% 49.3% 53.4% 45.1%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% 2009 16/17 2.6 6.4 56.6% 61.9% 40.3% 52.9% 50.6% 52.3% 42.5%
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% 2010 4/4 3.5 8.5 62.2% 56.7% 26.8% 43.1% 35.7% 46.0% 39.9%
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2012 3/3 1.0 5.7 56.0% 59.9% 44.4% 50.9% 38.2% 52.9% 44.2%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% 2013 1/2 2.0 7.0 56.3% 61.1% 25.0% 37.5% 28.6% 45.3% 38.6%
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 86/166 3.0 6.1 57.2% 63.7% 39.5% 51.1% 45.7% 53.3% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Marta Domachowska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1439 94.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.13 0–2 — — +0.53
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 2004 1612 129.9 — — — — -28 0 — 59.0% +0.85 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 +0.30
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2005 1550 117.6 -0.14 +0.44 1.060 51.2% -26 +112 — 44.4% -0.17 9–8 (53%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 +2.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1521 120.2 -0.85 -1.92 0.921 48.1% +23 +45 +16 37.7% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) 99.7 -0.58
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1551 118.1 -1.07 -1.16 0.947 49.0% +18 — — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 — — -0.43
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2008 1573 121.8 -1.08 +0.91 0.968 49.2% 0 +2 -16 45.2% -0.52 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -0.23
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 2009 1525 106.1 -2.40 -1.19 0.891 47.7% +2 +22 — 38.1% -0.79 2–6 (25%) — — -0.02
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2010 1469 92.7 -2.74 -2.38 0.739 42.9% +25 — — 20.0% -2.40 0–2 0–1 — +0.45
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 2012 1464 101.6 -0.94 -1.83 0.940 48.3% — — — 28.6% -0.71 1–0 — — +0.18
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2013 1434 95.1 -1.11 -1.51 0.705 41.8% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.25
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 — 1676 121.0 -1.28 -0.62 0.930 48.4% 0 +48 -2 42.1% -0.48 23–31 (43%) 16–14 (53%) 98.7 +1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.