H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Na Li vs Marta Domachowska H2H: 2-1
Na Li holds a 2–1 lead over Marta Domachowska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 40
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Na Li | 6-4 6-2 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Marta Domachowska | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Na Li | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2005* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Na Li | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Marta Domachowska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Marta Domachowska | #943 | #37 | 1,002 | 1,676 | 67 | 98 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Marta Domachowska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #73 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #65 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |