H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1

Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Na Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Australian Open fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #7 4-6 6-3 6-0 Na Li #16 Match data Jan 23, 2007* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li — #2 7,585 2,117 339 160 67.9% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Martina Hingis — #1 6,976 2,373 520 128 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 — — — — — — — 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 — — — — — — — 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 — — — — — — — 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2007 23–13 63.9% #29 1,814 0 1 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,862 0 2 2007 24–13 64.9% — 1,853 5 43
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,850 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 — — — — — — —
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 2,000 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 — — — — — — —
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 14 6 20 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 223 105 328 68.0% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — 303 77 380 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/487 of Na Li's and 84/109 of Martina Hingis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Martina Hingis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 33/36 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% 2006 54/72 1.5 2.3 63.9% 63.4% 52.8% 56.5% 51.8% 59.3% 49.6%
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% 2007 30/37 1.8 2.5 65.3% 65.3% 49.8% 55.4% 50.1% 59.7% 48.6%
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 372/499 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% — 84/648 1.6 2.3 64.4% 64.1% 51.8% 56.1% 51.2% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +20 -97 -268 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +21 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.78
19 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -241 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2052 167.3 — — — — +74 +178 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2007 1815 149.5 +2.69 +1.93 1.133 52.7% +68 -32 -42 62.1% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 3–1 (75%) 100.7 +1.06 2006 2019 166.2 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2008 1863 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -126 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.3 -1.78 2007 1854 149.4 +3.30 +4.02 1.205 54.0% +30 — +143 65.1% +1.35 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 90.1 +1.44
27 2009 1939 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +48 -153 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.5 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1850 150.6 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -22 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1863 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -58 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 2000 162.3 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 2068 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +55 -127 -178 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -109 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 160.3 +4.01 +3.65 1.175 53.4% +13 -20 -66 65.1% +1.14 89–65 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.2 -1.49 — 2373 179.4 +3.60 +4.99 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +2.00 92–58 (61%) 53–29 (65%) 103.4 -2.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.