H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Na Li vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Na Li holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2007 Charleston third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2007* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Na Li #18 6-1 6-4 Nicole Pratt #45 Match data
Mar 7, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #17 6-4 1-6 6-2 Nicole Pratt #47 Match data
May 5, 2005* Rabat WTA 250 R32 Clay Na Li #35 6-0 6-0 Nicole Pratt #104 Match data
Apr 29, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Na Li #40 7-5 6-1 Nicole Pratt #108 Match data
Sep 23, 2004* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Na Li #193 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1