H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Na Li vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 5-0

Na Li holds a 5–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2007 Charleston Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 0
5 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #18 6-1 6-4 Nicole Pratt #45 Match data Apr 12, 2007* R32 Charleston Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Na Li #17 6-4 1-6 6-2 Nicole Pratt #47 Match data Mar 7, 2007* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Na Li #35 6-0 6-0 Nicole Pratt #104 Match data May 5, 2005* R32 Morocco Open Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Na Li #40 7-5 6-1 Nicole Pratt #108 Match data Apr 29, 2005* R16 Estoril Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Na Li #193 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #49 Match data Sep 23, 2004* R32 China Open Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Na Li Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1990 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1993 2 5 7 28.6%
21 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2004 6 1 7 85.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 26 12 38 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2008 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Na Li Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6% —/—
24 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2% —/—
25 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2% —/—
26 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8% —/—
27 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1% —/—
28 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3% —/—
29 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2% —/—
30 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3% 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0% 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 —/— 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 —/— 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 —/— 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2% 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Na Li Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1990 1497 96.6 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 +0.59
18 2000 1497 107.1 +34 14.3% -2.14 0–1 -0.21 1991 1469 104.6 +37 17.6% -2.71 0–1 -0.50
19 2001 1481 95.3 0.0% -4.00 +0.12 1992 1492 108.8 +29 50.0% +0.83 0–1 +0.66
20 1993 1487 109.4 +23 33.3% -1.53 0–1 -0.35
21 1994 1465 92.2 +13 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 +0.51
22 2004 1600 125.7 +18 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.22 1995 1452 97.0 0.0% -4.50 +0.06
23 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97 1996 1434 100.4 0.0% -3.00 -0.01
24 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52 1997 1495 107.7 +15 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.88
25 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95 1998 1465 116.3 +15 +68 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 +0.10
26 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80 1999 1598 112.5 -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23 2000 1631 127.0 -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93 2001 1707 140.8 -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26 2002 1720 135.5 -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 -0.66
33 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 -0.45
Career 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.