H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Na Li vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 3-2

Na Li holds a 3–2 lead over Patty Schnyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Na Li leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2009 Indian Wells second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #45 7-5 6-2 Patty Schnyder #18 Match data
Jan 5, 2008* Gold Coast WTA 500 SF Hard Na Li #29 3-6 6-3 7-5 Patty Schnyder #16 Match data
May 13, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Na Li #61 2-6 7-6(3) 7-6(1) Patty Schnyder #9 Match data
Mar 4, 2005* Dubai WTA 500 R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #14 6-3 7-6(9) Na Li #46 Match data
Feb 24, 2005* Doha WTA 500 R32 Hard Patty Schnyder #14 7-5 3-6 7-5 Na Li #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Na Li Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 — — — — — — — 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 — — — — — — — 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11