H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Raluca Olaru in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2010 Warsaw round of 32 7-6(4) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Raluca Olaru | Match data | May 20, 2010* | R32 | Warsaw | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
| Na Li | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Raluca Olaru | Match data | Sep 2, 2009* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,117 | 338 | 159 | 68.0% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Raluca Olaru | #1,233 | #53 | 1,109 | 1,622 | 37 | 57 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Raluca Olaru | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #59 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #863 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,862 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #7 | 1,999 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,067 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,024 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Na Li | Raluca Olaru | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2004 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2014 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 22 | 9 | 31 | 71.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 35 | 8 | 43 | 81.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 22 | 3 | 25 | 88.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 222 | 104 | 326 | 68.1% | 77 | 33 | 110 | 70.0% | 37 | 18 | 55 | 67.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 18 | 25 | 43 | 41.9% | 17 | 26 | 43 | 39.5% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Na Li | Raluca Olaru | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1468 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.62 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| 18 | 2000 | 1497 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.21 | 2007 | 1584 | 122.0 | -0.90 | +0.38 | 1.013 | 50.3% | +2 | -27 | — | 55.6% | +0.39 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.80 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1481 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | 2008 | 1532 | 108.1 | -3.09 | -1.93 | 0.812 | 45.6% | +52 | -44 | — | 32.6% | -1.40 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.4 | -0.57 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1594 | 110.9 | -0.97 | -1.87 | 0.886 | 47.4% | -11 | -12 | — | 40.6% | -0.91 | 8–2 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | 108.7 | -0.02 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1515 | 103.7 | -2.14 | -2.43 | 0.855 | 46.5% | +14 | +7 | +46 | 31.3% | -1.46 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–2 | — | -0.34 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1600 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 81.3% | +1.81 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1711 | 139.1 | -0.18 | +0.14 | 0.999 | 49.8% | -25 | -56 | — | 61.4% | +1.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.5 | -0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 1819 | 148.7 | +1.65 | +1.60 | 1.068 | 51.4% | -79 | -12 | -62 | 61.2% | +1.05 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.4 | -2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 1820 | 150.2 | +2.75 | +2.06 | 1.133 | 52.7% | +69 | -38 | -48 | 62.2% | +0.96 | 7–7 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.95 | 2014 | 1502 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1864 | 153.7 | +2.74 | +2.93 | 1.119 | 52.6% | +37 | — | -127 | 60.4% | +0.83 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.2 | -1.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 1938 | 153.8 | +4.35 | +2.54 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +49 | -152 | -127 | 64.9% | +1.04 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 103.4 | -2.23 | 2016 | 1487 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 1850 | 150.5 | +4.51 | +3.61 | 1.195 | 53.7% | -23 | -4 | +91 | 64.3% | +1.23 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.6 | +0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 1862 | 151.3 | +3.52 | +2.62 | 1.106 | 52.2% | -57 | +131 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.61 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–6 (60%) | 102.8 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 2000 | 162.2 | +5.42 | +5.11 | 1.234 | 54.2% | -1 | -5 | -158 | 68.1% | +1.30 | 11–10 (52%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.7 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2067 | 165.5 | +5.56 | +6.05 | 1.265 | 55.0% | +56 | -126 | -177 | 72.1% | +1.64 | 8–5 (62%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.0 | -2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 2024 | 155.9 | +4.17 | +5.37 | 1.275 | 55.5% | +114 | -110 | -151 | 75.0% | +1.82 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2117 | 160.4 | +4.01 | +3.66 | 1.175 | 53.4% | +13 | -21 | -66 | 65.1% | +1.13 | 89–64 (58%) | 61–48 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.53 | — | 1623 | 112.8 | -1.71 | -1.63 | 0.882 | 47.3% | +18 | -13 | +46 | 39.7% | -0.86 | 18–15 (55%) | 4–11 (27%) | 98.5 | -0.31 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | 5 | 10 | 15 | May 10, 2014 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 2 | 11 | 13 | Mar 23, 2014 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 7 | 5 | 12 | Aug 17, 2013 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 6 | 11 | Oct 21, 2013 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6 | 4 | 10 | Oct 21, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pivovarova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 2010 | H2H |
| Kaia Kanepi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 16, 2010 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jun 23, 2010 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 20, 2010 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 5, 2010 | H2H |