H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Na Li holds a 1–0 lead over Ting (sr) Li in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Na Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2004 Guangzhou Open semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | 6-3 6-3 | Ting (sr) Li | Match data | Oct 2, 2004* | SF | Guangzhou Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,117 | 338 | 159 | 68.0% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| Ting (sr) Li | #1,152 | #136 | 259 | 1,564 | 8 | 13 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Na Li | Ting (sr) Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #327 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #533 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #404 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #174 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #177 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,862 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #7 | 1,999 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,067 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,024 | 2 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Na Li | Ting (sr) Li | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2005 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 22 | 9 | 31 | 71.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 35 | 8 | 43 | 81.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 22 | 3 | 25 | 88.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 222 | 104 | 326 | 68.1% | 77 | 33 | 110 | 70.0% | 37 | 18 | 55 | 67.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 372/485 of Na Li's and 3/8 of Ting (sr) Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Na Li | Ting (sr) Li | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 2005 | 2/37 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 71.4% | 54.3% | 62.6% | 49.2% | 41.7% | 56.3% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 36/58 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 71.1% | 61.5% | 49.3% | 51.6% | 50.5% | 57.6% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 33/34 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 71.5% | 62.4% | 51.9% | 52.6% | 45.7% | 59.2% | 46.2% | 2005 | 1/5 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 67.2% | 48.7% | 63.2% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 53.4% | 23.6% |
| 26 | 2008 | 32/42 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 66.3% | 63.4% | 48.3% | 58.5% | 51.1% | 58.2% | 46.8% | 2006 | 2/3 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 67.8% | 59.7% | 35.7% | 56.8% | 25.0% | 52.1% | 32.5% |
| 27 | 2009 | 47/52 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 63.9% | 65.4% | 51.1% | 45.7% | 50.4% | 59.9% | 46.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 48/56 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 68.5% | 65.7% | 49.2% | 50.4% | 51.7% | 60.4% | 47.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 39/50 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 69.1% | 64.4% | 47.3% | 54.6% | 51.5% | 59.1% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 49/60 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 68.7% | 65.1% | 53.5% | 57.5% | 51.0% | 61.2% | 47.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 52/60 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 63.2% | 67.9% | 49.4% | 58.5% | 57.2% | 61.0% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 34/36 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 66.5% | 66.3% | 49.7% | 55.6% | 57.2% | 60.8% | 50.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 372/497 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 67.4% | 64.9% | 50.1% | 53.8% | 51.9% | 59.9% | 47.2% | — | 3/21 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 67.6% | 56.0% | 44.8% | 49.0% | 27.8% | 52.5% | 29.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Na Li | Ting (sr) Li | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1497 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 1481 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1487 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.28 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1478 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2004 | 1600 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 81.3% | +1.81 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1711 | 139.1 | -0.18 | +0.14 | 0.999 | 49.8% | -25 | -56 | — | 61.4% | +1.04 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.5 | -0.97 | 2003 | 1471 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 24 | 2006 | 1819 | 148.7 | +1.65 | +1.60 | 1.068 | 51.4% | -79 | -12 | -62 | 61.2% | +1.05 | 9–4 (69%) | 7–4 (64%) | 111.4 | -2.52 | 2004 | 1549 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 61.1% | +1.11 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1820 | 150.2 | +2.75 | +2.06 | 1.133 | 52.7% | +69 | -38 | -48 | 62.2% | +0.96 | 7–7 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.95 | 2005 | 1544 | 103.9 | -0.56 | -1.30 | 0.508 | 38.9% | -1 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.23 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.15 |
| 26 | 2008 | 1864 | 153.7 | +2.74 | +2.93 | 1.119 | 52.6% | +37 | — | -127 | 60.4% | +0.83 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.2 | -1.80 | 2006 | 1507 | 96.5 | -1.88 | -2.35 | 0.678 | 42.6% | -10 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.67 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 27 | 2009 | 1938 | 153.8 | +4.35 | +2.54 | 1.150 | 52.7% | +49 | -152 | -127 | 64.9% | +1.04 | 10–6 (63%) | 8–6 (57%) | 103.4 | -2.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 1850 | 150.5 | +4.51 | +3.61 | 1.195 | 53.7% | -23 | -4 | +91 | 64.3% | +1.23 | 9–9 (50%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.6 | +0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 1862 | 151.3 | +3.52 | +2.62 | 1.106 | 52.2% | -57 | +131 | +42 | 62.8% | +0.61 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–6 (60%) | 102.8 | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 2000 | 162.2 | +5.42 | +5.11 | 1.234 | 54.2% | -1 | -5 | -158 | 68.1% | +1.30 | 11–10 (52%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.7 | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2067 | 165.5 | +5.56 | +6.05 | 1.265 | 55.0% | +56 | -126 | -177 | 72.1% | +1.64 | 8–5 (62%) | 7–6 (54%) | 99.0 | -2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 2024 | 155.9 | +4.17 | +5.37 | 1.275 | 55.5% | +114 | -110 | -151 | 75.0% | +1.82 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.9 | +0.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2117 | 160.4 | +4.01 | +3.66 | 1.175 | 53.4% | +13 | -21 | -66 | 65.1% | +1.13 | 89–64 (58%) | 61–48 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.53 | — | 1565 | 109.5 | -1.44 | -2.00 | 0.622 | 41.3% | +6 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.62 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.5 | +1.52 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sharapova | 5 | 10 | 15 | May 10, 2014 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 2 | 11 | 13 | Mar 23, 2014 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 7 | 5 | 12 | Aug 17, 2013 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 5 | 6 | 11 | Oct 21, 2013 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6 | 4 | 10 | Oct 21, 2013 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alina Jidkova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 30, 2005 | H2H |
| Tiantian Sun | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 28, 2006 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 2, 2006 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 18, 2006 | H2H |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 1, 2005 | H2H |