H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 1-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Alisa Kleybanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alisa Kleybanova
Russia Age 37 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #25 6-3 6-3 Alisa Kleybanova #54 Match data May 28, 2008* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Alisa Kleybanova #784 #20 2,485 1,877 108 92 54.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Alisa Kleybanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #368 1,514 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #237 1,499 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #240 1,472 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2008 17–16 51.5% #32 1,646 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2009 31–24 56.4% #29 1,780 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 2010 32–23 58.2% #25 1,828 0 2
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 2011 14–12 53.8% #68 1,780 0 2
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #545 1,777 0 2
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 2013 4–4 50.0% #188 1,770 0 2
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 2014 8–8 50.0% #139 1,771 0 2
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 — — — — — — —
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Alisa Kleybanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 22 16 38 57.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 25 16 41 61.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 77 61 138 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 184/197 of Alisa Kleybanova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Alisa Kleybanova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/2 3.0 7.0 44.1% 73.1% 33.3% 44.4% 25.0% 50.8% 42.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 32/33 4.7 4.5 51.3% 66.3% 45.9% 52.3% 51.0% 56.4% 44.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 53/55 4.1 3.5 57.0% 64.0% 48.4% 53.8% 49.8% 57.1% 44.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 50/55 3.2 3.6 57.2% 66.1% 48.1% 56.6% 48.4% 58.4% 44.4%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% 2011 25/26 3.2 3.0 55.8% 66.2% 45.5% 53.6% 54.0% 56.9% 46.2%
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% 2012 2/2 5.5 5.5 49.5% 66.1% 44.4% 68.8% 40.2% 55.1% 37.5%
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% 2013 7/8 5.6 4.1 50.8% 63.2% 35.4% 51.3% 42.8% 49.6% 43.0%
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% 2014 14/16 3.3 3.8 58.1% 64.7% 40.3% 64.2% 53.9% 54.8% 42.8%
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% — 184/200 3.8 3.7 55.6% 65.4% 46.2% 55.1% 50.0% 56.8% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Alisa Kleybanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1514 101.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1499 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 2006 1473 97.0 -1.84 -0.90 0.854 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.02
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 2008 1647 137.2 +0.59 +0.97 1.026 50.5% -43 -112 +90 50.0% +0.24 7–3 (70%) 0–3 (0%) 103.5 -0.20
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 2009 1781 141.6 +1.51 +0.24 1.040 50.9% -6 -169 -80 56.4% +0.35 10–13 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.3 +2.38
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 2010 1828 151.3 +2.66 +0.90 1.067 51.6% +4 -191 -99 56.8% +0.62 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 96.7 -1.00
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 2011 1780 142.2 +1.00 +1.86 1.072 51.5% +40 -131 — 53.3% +0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.66
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 2012 1777 108.2 -0.89 -1.44 0.834 48.0% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.25
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 2013 1770 112.0 -1.63 +0.12 0.852 46.4% +18 — — 42.1% -1.16 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -0.13
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 2014 1772 126.6 +0.26 +0.71 0.947 49.3% +40 -113 — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.87
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2017 1764 109.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 1878 145.8 +1.33 +0.77 1.030 50.7% +3 -147 0 53.0% +0.27 35–28 (56%) 16–23 (41%) 99.6 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.