H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0
Nadia Petrova holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 London Olympics third round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Grass | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,089 | 444 | 278 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,614 | 44 | 93 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Petrova | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,921 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #51 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,971 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,852 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,786 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #12 | 1,932 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,725 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,654 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |