H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Eleni Daniilidou H2H: 3-1

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–1 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2006 Beijing fourth round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Eleni Daniilidou
GRE Age 43 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 22, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-1 6-2 Eleni Daniilidou #53 Match data
Mar 24, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #7 6-2 6-0 Eleni Daniilidou #69 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #8 6-1 6-2 Eleni Daniilidou #85 Match data
May 8, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Eleni Daniilidou #15 1-6 6-2 6-2 Nadia Petrova #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Eleni Daniilidou #1,070 #14 1,639 1,878 185 203 47.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Eleni Daniilidou
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2001 5–8 38.5% #81 1,506 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2002 32–22 59.3% #22 1,778 0 1
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2003 32–24 57.1% #26 1,706 0 2
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2004 21–19 52.5% #34 1,683 0 3
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2005 14–20 41.2% #69 1,638 0 3
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2006 27–24 52.9% #36 1,720 0 4
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2007 27–29 48.2% #42 1,720 0 4
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2008 8–8 50.0% #144 1,700 0 5
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2009 0–1 0.0% #157 1,677 0 5
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2010 2–3 40.0% #165 1,666 0 5
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2011 6–12 33.3% #90 1,566 0 5
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2012 8–21 27.6% #100 1,483 0 5
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2013 3–10 23.1% #186 1,431 0 5
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2014 0–2 0.0% #414 1,412 0 5
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —