H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 0-2

Jelena Dokic holds a 2–0 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2011 Paris round of 16 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Dokic #120 6-4 7-6(4) Nadia Petrova #20 Match data Feb 11, 2011* R16 Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Jelena Dokic #15 6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 Nadia Petrova #38 Match data Aug 15, 2001* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5
22 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
30 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Petrova Jelena Dokic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3%
19 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
20 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0% — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's and 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Petrova Jelena Dokic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0%
21 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0% 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5%
22 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2% 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1%
24 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1% 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7%
26 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5% 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1%
27 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2% 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6%
28 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1% 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4%
29 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1% 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0%
30 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7% — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Petrova Jelena Dokic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27
16 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37
17 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05
18 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37
19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53
20 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66
21 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39
22 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38
23 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08
24 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02
26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16
27 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69
28 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32
29 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34
30 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59 — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.