H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-2

Melinda Czink holds a 2–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Melinda Czink leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Melinda Czink won the 2009 Quebec City quarterfinal 7-6(4) 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2009* Quebec City WTA 250 QF Hard Melinda Czink #52 7-6(4) 0-0 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Apr 17, 2009* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Melinda Czink #82 3-6 6-4 7-5 Nadia Petrova #10 Match data
Nov 1, 2008* Quebec City WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #11 6-1 6-4 Melinda Czink #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,794 89 136 39.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2004 2–15 11.8% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,741 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,524 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,519 0 1
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,499 0 1
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —