H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Shahar Peer H2H: 6-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 6–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2011 Washington final 7-5 6-2.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 0
6 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 2011 Washington WTA 250 F Hard Nadia Petrova #32 7-5 6-2 Shahar Peer #24 Match data
Aug 6, 2009* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #10 6-4 2-6 6-3 Shahar Peer #65 Match data
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Nadia Petrova #10 6-3 6-2 Shahar Peer #55 Match data
Jun 19, 2008* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Nadia Petrova #22 6-2 6-2 Shahar Peer #25 Match data
Oct 27, 2006* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #5 6-1 6-1 Shahar Peer #22 Match data
May 28, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #9 6-3 6-1 Shahar Peer #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13