H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nadia Petrova vs Sofia Arvidsson H2H: 2-0

Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Sofia Arvidsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2011 Indian Wells second round 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Sofia Arvidsson
SWE Age 42 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #20 6-4 7-6(3) Sofia Arvidsson #82 Match data
Oct 28, 2005* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Nadia Petrova #10 6-3 6-3 Sofia Arvidsson #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13
Sofia Arvidsson #320 #29 1,380 1,775 113 154 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Petrova Sofia Arvidsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #437 1,489 0 0
18 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #144 1,475 0 0
19 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #104 1,482 0 0
20 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0 2004 1–6 14.3% #213 1,434 0 0
21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0 2005 13–8 61.9% #67 1,598 0 0
22 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0 2006 16–19 45.7% #62 1,537 0 1
23 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1 2007 6–11 35.3% #98 1,508 0 1
24 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6 2008 12–18 40.0% #56 1,519 0 1
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7 2009 0–8 0.0% #139 1,443 0 1
26 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9 2010 14–16 46.7% #53 1,545 0 1
27 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9 2011 16–23 41.0% #78 1,627 0 1
28 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9 2012 27–20 57.4% #41 1,753 0 2
29 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10 2013 6–18 25.0% #120 1,597 0 2
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13 2014 0–1 0.0% #263 1,581 0 2
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13 2015 0–1 0.0% #320 1,568 0 2
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13 — — — — — — —