H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nadia Petrova vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 2-0
Nadia Petrova holds a 2–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2011 US Open first round 6-3 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nadia Petrova | 6-3 6-4 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | #578 | #3 | 3,882 | 2,077 | 441 | 276 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nadia Petrova | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #112 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #12 | 1,880 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #9 | 1,945 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,990 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #14 | 1,931 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,923 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #15 | 1,828 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #29 | 1,781 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,718 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #362 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |