H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nadia Podoroska vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 1-1
Nadia Podoroska and Camila Giorgi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2021 Montreal third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2021* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Podoroska | Match data |
| Nov 13, 2020* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Nadia Podoroska | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2016 | Moscow | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Nadia Podoroska | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | #471 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,762 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Podoroska | Camila Giorgi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |