H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Nadia Podoroska holds a 1–0 lead over Giuliana Olmos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2021 Guadalajara first round 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | 7-6(8) 3-6 6-2 | Giuliana Olmos | Match data | Mar 10, 2021* | R32 | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | #449 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,767 | 55 | 81 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Giuliana Olmos | #1,159 | #343 | 148 | 1,500 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadia Podoroska | Giuliana Olmos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–25 | 28.6% | #100 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #683 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #449 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nadia Podoroska | Giuliana Olmos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 31 | 45 | 76 | 40.8% | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's and 4/4 of Giuliana Olmos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Nadia Podoroska | Giuliana Olmos | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 61.3% | 57.4% | 38.5% | 38.6% | 25.8% | 50.0% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 64.8% | 46.8% | 41.7% | 37.2% | 30.8% | 44.6% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 53.8% | 52.5% | 51.8% | 60.6% | 53.4% | 48.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 11/11 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 68.6% | 52.6% | 48.3% | 49.7% | 43.7% | 51.2% | 46.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 61.1% | 62.3% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 43.9% | 56.0% | 45.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 66.6% | 45.4% | 56.2% | 44.3% | 59.0% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31/31 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.7% | 60.8% | 42.9% | 52.9% | 56.4% | 54.0% | 40.8% | 2019 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 67.6% | 48.6% | 41.6% | 47.4% | 38.8% | 46.2% | 42.2% |
| 27 | 2024 | 34/35 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 65.4% | 58.5% | 40.2% | 50.1% | 40.3% | 52.2% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 72.3% | 60.3% | 53.8% | 16.7% | 28.6% | 58.5% | 43.1% |
| 29 | 2026 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 66.0% | 59.4% | 50.2% | 40.9% | 17.3% | 54.9% | 36.7% | 2022 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 72.9% | 53.5% | 31.3% | 37.5% | 20.0% | 47.5% | 34.0% |
| Career | — | 131/136 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 59.4% | 44.0% | 50.6% | 44.1% | 53.6% | 42.2% | — | 4/4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 70.1% | 52.8% | 42.0% | 37.3% | 31.5% | 49.6% | 40.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nadia Podoroska | Giuliana Olmos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1575 | 106.0 | -1.26 | -1.72 | 0.738 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 1609 | 100.8 | -4.92 | -1.96 | 0.726 | 42.0% | — | -7 | — | 33.3% | -1.92 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 1581 | 102.9 | -0.91 | -1.28 | 1.037 | 51.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 1510 | 85.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 1737 | 123.1 | -2.40 | +1.52 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -106 | +39 | — | 56.0% | +0.04 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 1713 | 130.1 | -0.63 | +2.06 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -79 | +84 | -38 | 48.0% | -0.13 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.0 | +0.71 | 2017 | 1481 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 1660 | 105.0 | +0.71 | -0.89 | 1.044 | 50.7% | -31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.84 | 2018 | 1450 | 89.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 1670 | 120.5 | -1.86 | -1.71 | 0.886 | 47.7% | -27 | +84 | -50 | 43.2% | -0.43 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.0 | -0.19 | 2019 | 1439 | 99.8 | -1.64 | +0.83 | 0.783 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.04 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1644 | 121.6 | -3.46 | -2.62 | 0.842 | 46.2% | +35 | -18 | — | 33.3% | -1.16 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–6 (25%) | 93.1 | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 1641 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 | 2021 | 1453 | 100.3 | +1.86 | -0.48 | 1.039 | 50.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 29 | 2026 | 1614 | 110.8 | +1.33 | -1.67 | 0.814 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 30.8% | -1.54 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.17 | 2022 | 1459 | 96.2 | -1.67 | -2.78 | 0.647 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1446 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1768 | 121.8 | -1.86 | -0.74 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -29 | +39 | -44 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 21–20 (51%) | 14–13 (52%) | 101.1 | +0.15 | — | 1500 | 94.5 | -0.77 | -0.40 | 0.800 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Sep 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 23, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oceane Dodin | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 12, 2022 | H2H |
| Nadia Podoroska | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Nao Hibino | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 4, 2019 | H2H |