H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nadia Podoroska vs Lauren Davis H2H: 0-2

Lauren Davis holds a 2–0 lead over Nadia Podoroska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2020 Monterrey Open first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Podoroska
Argentina Age 29 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lauren Davis #61 6-0 6-3 Nadia Podoroska #178 Match data Mar 5, 2020* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lauren Davis #35 6-2 6-1 Nadia Podoroska #166 Match data May 3, 2017* R32 Morocco Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Podoroska #449 #36 1,787 1,767 55 81 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Podoroska Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 2016 0–3 0.0% #194 1,574 0 0 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2017 2–4 33.3% #311 1,608 0 0 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2018 1–1 50.0% #304 1,580 0 0 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2020 7–4 63.6% #47 1,736 0 0 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2021 17–17 50.0% #84 1,712 0 0 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2022 4–4 50.0% #195 1,660 0 0 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2023 13–18 41.9% #67 1,670 0 0 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2024 10–25 28.6% #100 1,643 0 0 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2025 0–1 0.0% #471 1,640 0 0 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2026 1–4 20.0% #449 1,613 0 0 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Podoroska Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2020 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2022 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 31 45 76 40.8% 19 28 47 40.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Podoroska Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 2016 3/3 1.3 3.7 61.3% 57.4% 38.5% 38.6% 25.8% 50.0% 36.9% 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2017 6/6 0.3 4.5 64.8% 46.8% 41.7% 37.2% 30.8% 44.6% 40.2% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2018 2/2 1.0 3.0 63.2% 53.8% 52.5% 51.8% 60.6% 53.4% 48.3% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2020 11/11 0.5 1.5 68.6% 52.6% 48.3% 49.7% 43.7% 51.2% 46.7% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2021 31/34 2.5 3.7 61.1% 62.3% 46.9% 52.9% 43.9% 56.0% 45.6% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2022 8/8 1.5 5.3 63.1% 66.6% 45.4% 56.2% 44.3% 59.0% 42.8% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2023 31/31 1.8 4.1 61.7% 60.8% 42.9% 52.9% 56.4% 54.0% 40.8% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2024 34/35 1.6 3.4 65.4% 58.5% 40.2% 50.1% 40.3% 52.2% 40.3% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2026 5/5 2.2 4.6 66.0% 59.4% 50.2% 40.9% 17.3% 54.9% 36.7% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
Career — 131/136 1.7 3.7 63.5% 59.4% 44.0% 50.6% 44.1% 53.6% 42.2% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Podoroska Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 2016 1575 106.0 -1.26 -1.72 0.738 43.2% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.22 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2017 1609 100.8 -4.92 -1.96 0.726 42.0% — -7 — 33.3% -1.92 2–0 — — -0.05 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2018 1581 102.9 -0.91 -1.28 1.037 51.0% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2019 1510 85.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2020 1737 123.1 -2.40 +1.52 0.955 49.0% -106 +39 — 56.0% +0.04 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — -0.19 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2021 1713 130.1 -0.63 +2.06 1.037 50.8% -79 +84 -38 48.0% -0.13 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 105.0 +0.71 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2022 1660 105.0 +0.71 -0.89 1.044 50.7% -31 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.84 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2023 1670 120.5 -1.86 -1.71 0.886 47.7% -27 +84 -50 43.2% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.0 -0.19 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2024 1644 121.6 -3.46 -2.62 0.842 46.2% +35 -18 — 33.3% -1.16 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 93.1 -0.31 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2025 1641 106.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.25 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2026 1614 110.8 +1.33 -1.66 0.814 45.1% — — — 30.8% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.17 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
Career — 1768 121.8 -1.86 -0.74 0.910 47.9% -29 +39 -44 41.7% -0.67 21–20 (51%) 14–13 (52%) 101.1 +0.15 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.