H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nadia Podoroska vs Timea Babos H2H: 1-1

Nadia Podoroska and Timea Babos are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on clay, while Timea Babos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2021 Belgrade first round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nadia Podoroska
Argentina Age 29 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Podoroska #42 6-2 4-6 6-3 Timea Babos #107 Match data May 19, 2021* R32 Belgrade WTA 250 Clay
Timea Babos #44 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 Nadia Podoroska #237 Match data Aug 2, 2016* R32 Florianopolis International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nadia Podoroska #449 #36 1,787 1,767 55 81 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nadia Podoroska Timea Babos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0
19 2016 0–3 0.0% #194 1,574 0 0 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1
20 2017 2–4 33.3% #311 1,608 0 0 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1
21 2018 1–1 50.0% #304 1,580 0 0 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1
23 2020 7–4 63.6% #47 1,736 0 0 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1
24 2021 17–17 50.0% #84 1,712 0 0 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2
25 2022 4–4 50.0% #195 1,660 0 0 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3
26 2023 13–18 41.9% #67 1,670 0 0 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3
27 2024 10–25 28.6% #100 1,643 0 0 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3
28 2025 0–1 0.0% #471 1,640 0 0 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3
29 2026 1–4 20.0% #449 1,613 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nadia Podoroska Timea Babos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2018 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2020 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2022 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2024 8 14 22 36.4% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2026 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 31 45 76 40.8% 19 28 47 40.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's and 283/304 of Timea Babos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nadia Podoroska Timea Babos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0%
19 2016 3/3 1.3 3.7 61.3% 57.4% 38.5% 38.6% 25.8% 50.0% 36.9% 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9%
20 2017 6/6 0.3 4.5 64.8% 46.8% 41.7% 37.2% 30.8% 44.6% 40.2% 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3%
21 2018 2/2 1.0 3.0 63.2% 53.8% 52.5% 51.8% 60.6% 53.4% 48.3% 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1%
23 2020 11/11 0.5 1.5 68.6% 52.6% 48.3% 49.7% 43.7% 51.2% 46.7% 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2%
24 2021 31/34 2.5 3.7 61.1% 62.3% 46.9% 52.9% 43.9% 56.0% 45.6% 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0%
25 2022 8/8 1.5 5.3 63.1% 66.6% 45.4% 56.2% 44.3% 59.0% 42.8% 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8%
26 2023 31/31 1.8 4.1 61.7% 60.8% 42.9% 52.9% 56.4% 54.0% 40.8% 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9%
27 2024 34/35 1.6 3.4 65.4% 58.5% 40.2% 50.1% 40.3% 52.2% 40.3% 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6%
29 2026 5/5 2.2 4.6 66.0% 59.4% 50.2% 40.9% 17.3% 54.9% 36.7% 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4%
Career — 131/136 1.7 3.7 63.5% 59.4% 44.0% 50.6% 44.1% 53.6% 42.2% — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nadia Podoroska Timea Babos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
19 2016 1575 106.0 -1.26 -1.72 0.738 43.2% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.22 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38
20 2017 1609 100.8 -4.92 -1.96 0.726 42.0% — -7 — 33.3% -1.92 2–0 — — -0.05 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12
21 2018 1581 102.9 -0.91 -1.28 1.037 51.0% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.04 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74
22 2019 1510 85.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03
23 2020 1737 123.1 -2.40 +1.52 0.955 49.0% -106 +39 — 56.0% +0.04 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — -0.19 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26
24 2021 1713 130.1 -0.63 +2.06 1.037 50.8% -79 +84 -38 48.0% -0.13 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 105.0 +0.71 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56
25 2022 1660 105.0 +0.71 -0.89 1.044 50.7% -31 — — 50.0% -0.25 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.84 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06
26 2023 1670 120.5 -1.86 -1.71 0.886 47.7% -27 +84 -50 43.2% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.0 -0.19 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77
27 2024 1644 121.6 -3.46 -2.62 0.842 46.2% +35 -18 — 33.3% -1.16 2–5 (29%) 2–6 (25%) 93.1 -0.31 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
28 2025 1641 106.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.25 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01
29 2026 1614 110.8 +1.33 -1.66 0.814 45.1% — — — 30.8% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.17 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13
Career — 1768 121.8 -1.86 -0.74 0.910 47.9% -29 +39 -44 41.7% -0.67 21–20 (51%) 14–13 (52%) 101.1 +0.15 — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.