H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nadiia Kichenok vs Ayumi Morita H2H: 0-1
Ayumi Morita holds a 1–0 lead over Nadiia Kichenok in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ayumi Morita leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ayumi Morita won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 36
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ayumi Morita | 6-2 7-6(5) | Nadiia Kichenok | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadiia Kichenok | #1,040 | #100 | 663 | 1,517 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ayumi Morita | #1,117 | #40 | 1,345 | 1,700 | 82 | 126 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadiia Kichenok | Ayumi Morita | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #83 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #73 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #49 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #248 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |