H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nadiia Kichenok vs Monica Puig H2H: 0-1
Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Nadiia Kichenok in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2013 Guangzhou third round 7-5 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Monica Puig | 7-5 7-6(4) | Nadiia Kichenok | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadiia Kichenok | #1,040 | #100 | 663 | 1,517 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nadiia Kichenok | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |