Nao Hibino
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Trevisan | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Misaki Doi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 14, 2025 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 2-0
Nao Hibino holds a 2–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nao Hibino leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2018 Tashkent round of 32 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | 6-3 6-3 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data | Sep 27, 2018* | R32 | Tashkent | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Nao Hibino | 6-4 6-4 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data | Sep 13, 2018* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #228 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 80 | 121 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,927 | 158 | 147 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #94 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #97 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #46 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #129 | 1,527 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2015 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 21 | 2016 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2015 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 22 | 2017 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2016 | 20 | 16 | 36 | 55.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 23 | 2018 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2019 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2020 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2021 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2020 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 65 | 83 | 148 | 43.9% | 13 | 27 | 40 | 32.5% | 2 | 11 | 13 | 15.4% | — | 98 | 101 | 199 | 49.2% | 45 | 29 | 74 | 60.8% | 15 | 17 | 32 | 46.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/194 of Nao Hibino's and 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 64.1% | 64.4% | 38.1% | 59.9% | 56.7% | 54.8% | 34.9% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9/9 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 58.4% | 66.2% | 47.0% | 58.4% | 39.6% | 58.4% | 43.0% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 34/42 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 56.8% | 64.2% | 47.1% | 51.2% | 44.0% | 56.7% | 46.5% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 57/62 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 60.4% | 66.0% | 47.6% | 54.0% | 50.3% | 58.5% | 46.5% |
| 21 | 2016 | 39/41 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 65.7% | 58.2% | 49.2% | 50.1% | 54.8% | 54.9% | 41.0% | 2015 | 25/29 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 60.1% | 62.4% | 47.7% | 49.2% | 48.0% | 56.8% | 41.5% |
| 22 | 2017 | 26/28 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 64.7% | 58.6% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 38.7% | 2016 | 50/54 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 60.4% | 63.6% | 48.8% | 50.2% | 45.9% | 57.8% | 44.7% |
| 23 | 2018 | 13/15 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 61.4% | 60.0% | 45.3% | 59.2% | 40.6% | 54.4% | 41.1% | 2017 | 28/31 | 2.3 | 3.5 | 58.3% | 58.7% | 45.0% | 49.3% | 48.3% | 53.0% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2019 | 11/11 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 64.0% | 64.7% | 45.9% | 56.5% | 43.7% | 57.7% | 43.6% | 2018 | 24/24 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 59.2% | 63.1% | 44.0% | 57.2% | 46.4% | 55.5% | 44.2% |
| 25 | 2020 | 15/15 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 65.5% | 62.6% | 45.8% | 52.9% | 41.8% | 56.6% | 46.8% | 2019 | 14/14 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 60.7% | 42.3% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 53.3% | 42.9% |
| 26 | 2021 | 21/23 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 65.0% | 55.1% | 36.6% | 39.9% | 47.2% | 48.2% | 39.1% | 2020 | 14/14 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 65.5% | 65.3% | 49.8% | 61.5% | 49.6% | 59.8% | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2022 | 10/10 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 70.4% | 59.9% | 44.7% | 43.5% | 51.8% | 55.2% | 46.5% | 2021 | 7/7 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.7% | 65.2% | 45.7% | 49.6% | 50.9% | 57.9% | 46.8% |
| 28 | 2023 | 21/21 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 67.4% | 58.0% | 47.2% | 47.1% | 60.3% | 54.4% | 42.1% | 2022 | 8/8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 57.0% | 61.4% | 51.7% | 60.8% | 45.3% | 57.3% | 42.6% |
| 29 | 2024 | 20/20 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 65.6% | 55.3% | 43.7% | 48.7% | 50.3% | 51.1% | 38.4% | 2023 | 6/6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 66.8% | 62.6% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 51.9% | 59.0% | 43.5% |
| 30 | 2025 | 3/9 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 64.6% | 58.9% | 48.8% | 52.8% | 45.8% | 54.6% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 68.8% | 32.1% | 71.4% | 25.0% | 55.3% | 41.6% | 2025 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 62.0% | 59.5% | 47.9% | 54.2% | 37.4% | 55.1% | 41.8% |
| Career | — | 180/202 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 65.5% | 58.6% | 45.3% | 50.1% | 48.9% | 53.8% | 41.3% | — | 282/306 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 60.0% | 63.5% | 47.1% | 52.6% | 47.7% | 56.9% | 44.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nao Hibino | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1493 | 102.7 | -1.04 | -2.27 | 0.773 | 45.8% | +18 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.78 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1546 | 114.3 | +1.12 | -0.43 | 1.033 | 50.7% | +7 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.38 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.18 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1752 | 141.5 | +1.07 | +2.65 | 1.074 | 51.5% | -37 | -74 | -156 | 58.2% | +0.47 | 7–9 (44%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.1 | -1.18 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.71 | 2014 | 1863 | 150.8 | +2.70 | +3.29 | 1.122 | 52.4% | -96 | +19 | -107 | 61.4% | +0.82 | 10–8 (56%) | 7–5 (58%) | 104.2 | -1.19 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1639 | 113.6 | -1.11 | -1.79 | 0.909 | 48.3% | -18 | -53 | -78 | 44.0% | -0.55 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.3 | +0.05 | 2015 | 1702 | 123.0 | -1.20 | +0.51 | 0.961 | 49.3% | +34 | +67 | -27 | 50.0% | -0.02 | 3–7 (30%) | 6–5 (55%) | 94.8 | +1.50 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1544 | 109.2 | -2.04 | -3.51 | 0.840 | 47.2% | +35 | -50 | — | 39.0% | -0.76 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–1 | — | +0.77 | 2016 | 1697 | 133.5 | +1.68 | +1.09 | 1.060 | 51.1% | -16 | +85 | -6 | 54.6% | +0.26 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.4 | -1.41 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1597 | 121.9 | -0.94 | -1.44 | 0.902 | 47.8% | +21 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.87 | 0–2 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.36 | 2017 | 1602 | 127.4 | -1.89 | -0.77 | 0.909 | 47.9% | -17 | +221 | +25 | 40.3% | -0.82 | 3–9 (25%) | 4–3 (57%) | 93.2 | -0.95 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1619 | 112.2 | -0.45 | -0.48 | 1.031 | 50.5% | +13 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.04 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +1.01 | 2018 | 1670 | 127.3 | -0.75 | +1.08 | 0.994 | 49.8% | -14 | +151 | — | 42.2% | -0.31 | 2–1 (67%) | 5–0 (100%) | 106.6 | +0.16 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1648 | 124.3 | +0.36 | +2.53 | 1.079 | 51.6% | -35 | -88 | — | 57.6% | +0.73 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.2 | +0.20 | 2019 | 1617 | 127.0 | -1.49 | -0.31 | 0.919 | 47.9% | +26 | — | — | 38.2% | -0.62 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.76 |
| 26 | 2021 | 1528 | 96.1 | -6.17 | -3.62 | 0.754 | 44.2% | -45 | -13 | -10 | 22.7% | -2.09 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.9 | +0.88 | 2020 | 1713 | 127.8 | +1.82 | +1.44 | 1.130 | 52.7% | -64 | +114 | — | 65.7% | +1.00 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.7 | +0.41 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1578 | 112.0 | -0.72 | +0.28 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -34 | — | — | 47.6% | +0.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.9 | +0.93 | 2021 | 1704 | 112.6 | +0.44 | +0.05 | 1.114 | 52.1% | -53 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.40 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.45 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1658 | 122.0 | -1.96 | -1.76 | 0.923 | 48.2% | -9 | — | — | 43.5% | -0.33 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.9 | +0.98 | 2022 | 1633 | 117.1 | +0.22 | +0.59 | 0.998 | 50.2% | -38 | — | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 0–3 (0%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.2 | +0.57 |
| 29 | 2024 | 1603 | 118.1 | -4.14 | -2.60 | 0.784 | 44.9% | +36 | -97 | -114 | 28.6% | -1.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.24 | 2023 | 1637 | 118.3 | +0.17 | -0.98 | 1.060 | 51.3% | — | +151 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.7 | +1.03 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1514 | 109.3 | -1.77 | -0.47 | 0.962 | 49.4% | -11 | +10 | — | 30.0% | -1.65 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.04 | 2024 | 1618 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1558 | 107.8 | -1.65 | +0.34 | 0.929 | 48.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.10 | 2025 | 1611 | 113.9 | +1.04 | -0.76 | 0.931 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.17 | 1–1 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1726 | 117.5 | -2.09 | -1.72 | 0.893 | 47.8% | 0 | -46 | -68 | 40.3% | -0.70 | 25–27 (48%) | 18–19 (49%) | 101.7 | +2.42 | — | 1927 | 140.4 | +0.68 | +1.24 | 1.032 | 50.6% | -27 | +65 | -55 | 53.1% | +0.19 | 43–57 (43%) | 45–29 (61%) | 102.0 | -0.43 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Eugenie Bouchard
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 19, 2018 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 28, 2017 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 4 | 2 | 6 | May 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 20, 2019 | H2H |