H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-3
Julia Goerges holds a 3–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Nurnberg third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2017* | Nurnberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-1 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2016* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nao Hibino | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |