H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nao Hibino vs Madison Brengle H2H: 0-2

Madison Brengle holds a 2–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Madison Brengle leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2022 Melbourne 1 first round 7-6(3) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nao Hibino
Japan Age 31 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #59 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Nao Hibino #129 Match data Jan 6, 2022* R32 Melbourne 1 WTA 250 Hard
Madison Brengle #42 6-1 6-2 Nao Hibino #124 Match data Sep 18, 2015* R16 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nao Hibino #228 #56 1,050 1,726 80 121 39.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nao Hibino Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2015 6–2 75.0% #66 1,559 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2016 19–22 46.3% #94 1,639 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2017 11–17 39.3% #97 1,544 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2018 5–10 33.3% #114 1,597 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2019 6–5 54.5% #106 1,619 0 2 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2020 9–6 60.0% #73 1,647 0 2 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2021 5–17 22.7% #129 1,527 0 2 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2022 4–6 40.0% #138 1,578 0 2 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2023 9–12 42.9% #94 1,657 0 3 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2024 4–16 20.0% #145 1,603 0 3 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2025 2–7 22.2% #174 1,514 0 3 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2026 0–1 0.0% #228 1,558 0 3 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nao Hibino Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2015 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2017 11 11 22 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2018 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2021 1 9 10 10.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2022 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2023 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2024 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2025 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 65 83 148 43.9% 13 27 40 32.5% 2 11 13 15.4% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/195 of Nao Hibino's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nao Hibino Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2016 39/41 1.4 2.8 65.7% 58.2% 49.2% 50.1% 54.8% 54.9% 41.0% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2017 26/28 1.8 3.6 64.7% 58.6% 45.9% 54.7% 42.0% 53.9% 38.7% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2018 13/15 2.2 2.8 61.4% 60.0% 45.3% 59.2% 40.6% 54.4% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 11/11 2.6 2.8 64.0% 64.7% 45.9% 56.5% 43.7% 57.7% 43.6% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2020 15/15 1.1 2.7 65.5% 62.6% 45.8% 52.9% 41.8% 56.6% 46.8% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2021 21/23 1.8 2.9 65.0% 55.1% 36.6% 39.9% 47.2% 48.2% 39.1% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2022 10/10 1.6 2.4 70.4% 59.9% 44.7% 43.5% 51.8% 55.2% 46.5% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2023 21/21 1.4 2.2 67.4% 58.0% 47.2% 47.1% 60.3% 54.4% 42.1% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2024 20/20 1.3 3.1 65.6% 55.3% 43.7% 48.7% 50.3% 51.1% 38.4% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2025 3/9 2.0 3.0 64.6% 58.9% 48.8% 52.8% 45.8% 54.6% 43.7% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2026 1/2 2.0 3.0 63.2% 68.8% 32.1% 71.4% 25.0% 55.3% 41.6% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 180/203 1.6 2.9 65.5% 58.6% 45.3% 50.1% 48.9% 53.8% 41.3% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nao Hibino Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2015 1560 105.6 — — — — +14 — — 66.7% +0.60 1–0 — — +0.71 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2016 1639 113.6 -1.11 -1.79 0.909 48.3% -18 -53 -78 44.0% -0.55 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 104.3 +0.05 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2017 1544 109.2 -2.04 -3.51 0.840 47.2% +35 -50 — 39.0% -0.76 4–5 (44%) 1–1 — +0.77 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2018 1597 121.9 -0.94 -1.44 0.902 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.87 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2019 1619 112.2 -0.45 -0.48 1.031 50.5% +13 — — 45.8% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.01 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2020 1648 124.3 +0.36 +2.53 1.079 51.6% -35 -88 — 57.6% +0.73 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.20 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2021 1528 96.1 -6.17 -3.62 0.754 44.2% -45 -13 -10 22.7% -2.09 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.88 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2022 1578 112.0 -0.72 +0.28 1.038 50.9% -34 — — 47.6% +0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +0.93 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2023 1658 122.0 -1.96 -1.76 0.923 48.2% -9 — — 43.5% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 +0.98 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2024 1603 118.1 -4.14 -2.60 0.784 44.9% +36 -97 -114 28.6% -1.57 3–6 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2025 1514 109.3 -1.77 -0.47 0.962 49.4% -11 +10 — 30.0% -1.65 0–2 — — -0.04 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2026 1558 107.8 -0.02 +0.29 0.929 48.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 117.5 -2.08 -1.72 0.893 47.8% 0 -46 -68 40.3% -0.70 25–27 (48%) 18–19 (49%) 101.7 +2.42 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.